← Search

Steven Lesko

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Saint Louis, MO
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
12 matches · 12W–0L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history12 matches
W
2026-06-14 · Freeman/65&Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregg Hanson championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · Freeman/65&Over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregg Hanson championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · Freeman/65&Over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jim Syrett championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 7-5
W
2022-06-09 · STL/Arnstein/Novatny/55&Over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Randy Freeman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-06-02 · STL/Arnstein/Novatny/55&Over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jim Syrett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-5
W
2022-05-26 · STL/Arnstein/Novatny/55&Over9.0M · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Arnstein
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-3
W
2021-06-10 · STL/Arnstein/Lesko/55&Over9.0M · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Gregg Hanson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2021-05-27 · STL/Arnstein/Lesko/55&Over9.0M · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with John Novatny
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2019-05-04 · MoValley-Barenkamp/Arnstein · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with James Barenkamp
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
W
2019-04-07 · STL-WC-Rensch (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dominic Oldham
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
W
2019-03-03 · STL-WC-Rensch (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Steve Brand
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
W
2019-02-03 · STL-WC-Rensch (S) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jim Syrett
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
100%
9W–0L · 61.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal