← Search

Marisa Preciado

SNOHOMISH, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
116 matches · 55W–61L · seasons 2021–2023
Where Marisa sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Marisa is one of 1525 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 65% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Marisa has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Marisa has gone from the 27th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
75%
18W–6L · 63.8% of games
3.5
33.3%
17W–34L · 46.3% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 62.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history116 matches
L
Kay Almer / Owen Changmixed
2023-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Allen Gear
+0.000better than expected — took 43% of games against 27% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2023-06-24 · #2 Doubles · with Trisha Hoss
−0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Jennifer Ablow / Xiaotong Wangchamps
2023-06-24 · #3 Doubles · with Trisha Hoss
+0.028better than expected — took 62% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2023-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barrett Park
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2023-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicolle Sherwood
+0.041better than expected — took 44% of games against 31% expected
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-23 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.035below expectation — took 37% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Medilyn Barrett / TRANG TRAN
2023-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antonette Wood
+0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 32% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Juli Rasmussen
2023-05-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.030below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-04-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Silvia Cascante
−0.027below expectation — took 32% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2023-04-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicolle Sherwood
+0.029better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Jayne Banks
2023-04-06 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.032below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Jenean Creason
2023-03-28 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.029below expectation — took 59% of games against 67% expected
7-6, 3-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.