← Search

David Sapp

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Johnson City, TN
4.0S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
21 matches · 13W–8L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history21 matches
L
2025-07-20 · Mitchell/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcia Sentell mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-07-12 · Mitchell/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Archer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
L
2024-04-06 · Addison/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daryl Addison
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-30 · Addison/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edgar Ongtengco
loading the estimate
6-7, 3-6
W
2023-07-18 · Archer/META · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Sapp mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2023-06-20 · Archer/META · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Sapp mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-1
W
2023-06-10 · Archer/META · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Sapp mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-0
W
2022-04-16 · Faidley/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Faidley
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2022-04-09 · Faidley/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Faidley
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2022-04-02 · Faidley/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Faidley
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2022-03-26 · Faidley/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Kyte
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2021-06-24 · TN/META/Archer · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Sapp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 47.5% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 73.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe