← Search

Jim Green

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Johnson City, TN
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
32 matches · 23W–9L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history32 matches
W
2026-10-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Analida Alexay mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-10-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcia Sentell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Analida Alexay mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Caveney mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Caveney mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcia Sentell mixed championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Liu/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Snyder
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-03 · Liu/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Lavinder
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-06-25 · Mitchell/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Archer mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-21 · Mitchell/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynn Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-06-23 · Mitchell/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emily Caveney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-04-13 · Rogers/META · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 58.4% of games
4.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54% of games
8.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 58.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal