← Search

Amber Wichowsky

Milwaukee, WI
4.0A year-end 2025
25 matches · 9W–16L · seasons 2025–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.65
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Milwaukee · 4.0
10 of 11
WI · 4.0
56 of 75
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Amber is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Amber has been a steady 4.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

3.54.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 53.7% of games
7.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history25 matches
W
2026-07-23 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.006about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.052better than expected — took 71% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.031better than expected — took 41% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
Anjali Sharma
2026-06-02 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Holly Haas / Kerri Huebner
2026-04-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cary Fulford
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nina Capati
+0.006about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
5-7, 6-2
L
Laurie Pasternak / Karen Parks
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Hansen
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
L
Joyce Koker / Mary Underhill
2026-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cana Comer
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
L
Sara King / Anne Daniels
2025-10-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kay Bokowy
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-0
L
2025-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cana Comer
−0.039below expectation — took 32% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-08-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Kelderman
−0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Kristin Ferge / Rebecca Bradley
2025-08-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Mcelhaney
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.