← Search

Elizabeth MacPherson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Ridgeland, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
115 matches · 62W–53L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history115 matches
L
2026-10-13 · Coffey, Celia · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Mincey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-10-12 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Becca Dickerson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-10-01 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Jeffcoat
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-17 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Mincey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-13 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Baugh championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-12 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Baugh championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-11 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Baugh championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-11 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Baugh championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · Coffey, Celia · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Amanda Mincey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-20 · Coffey, Celia · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leslie Ledoux
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-27 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shannon Pool
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-21 · MacPherson, Elizabeth · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tara Baugh
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 53.7% of games
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 52.3% of games
4.0
39.5%
15W–23L · 43.2% of games
7.5
68.6%
24W–11L · 56.6% of games
8.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
24 matches
#1 Singles
18%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
20 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova