← Search

Justin Madison

Clyde Hill, WA
0.0 year-end
64 matches · 30W–34L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Justin sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Justin is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Justin has been 4.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.520192020202120222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 9.0, Justin has gone from the 42nd to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
54.8%
17W–14L · 51.1% of games
8.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 50.9% of games
9.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 47.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history64 matches
L
2023-01-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tim Mcroberts
+0.015about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
Jeffrey Lee / Gerald Russell
2022-11-18 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tim Mcroberts
−0.013below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-22 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denis Brasfield
−0.018about as expected — took 63% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
David Perzik / Wilfredo Dela Cruz
2022-10-15 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Masahiro Terada
−0.002about as expected — took 47% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Scott Charlston / Tyler Chin
2022-10-02 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Benny Viloria
−0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Eric Newman / Tim Giacometti
2022-09-25 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Denis Brasfield
+0.014better than expected — took 58% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-09-18 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tim Mcroberts
−0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2022-04-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adrian Cosma
−0.009about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Hoona Jo / Ham Kang
2022-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tim Mcroberts
−0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Jeffrey Stoner / Thomas Glass
2022-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Peter Griff
−0.007about as expected — took 45% of games against 49% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
Andrew Pei / Mark Weil
2022-04-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tim Mcroberts
+0.007about as expected — took 61% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2022-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hao Dang
−0.013below expectation — took 33% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.