Search

Rob Green

Seattle, WA
4.5S year-end 2026
73 matches · 34W–39L · seasons 20192025
Where Rob sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Rob is one of 395 men at 4.5 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 4.5 account for 98% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rob has been 4.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.5201920202021202220232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 9.0, Rob has gone from the 48th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 51.8% of games
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.9% of games
9.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 54% of games
10.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
54.5%
6W–5L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history73 matches
L
2025-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Battison
0.041below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-11-04 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Stephen Rosen
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2023-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anne Medzegian
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2023-06-24 · #3 Doubles · with Alex Rosen
+0.069better than expected — took 75% of games against 40% expected
2-6, 0-0
W
David Elofson / Jeff Brantnerchamps
2023-06-23 · #3 Doubles · with Alex Rosen
0.001about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Battison
0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2023-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Allen
+0.008better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-01-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Allen
0.013below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-11-13 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alex Rosen
0.004about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
2022-10-29 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Alex Rosen
+0.032better than expected — took 92% of games against 67% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Patrick McGowan / Benny Viloria
2022-10-22 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with William Wagner
0.009about as expected — took 53% of games against 55% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2022-10-09 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ronald Mulberg
+0.021better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.