Search

Elaine Hartnett

Woodinville, WA
0.0 year-end
38 matches · 13W–25L · seasons 20192024
Where Elaine sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Elaine is one of 0 women at 0.0 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Elaine has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 4 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020222024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Elaine has gone from the 36th to the 24th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2020.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
4W–8L · 44.4% of games
7.0mixed
35.7%
5W–9L · 41.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history38 matches
L
2024-01-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alane Diehl
0.031below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2022-02-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Gonzales
+0.014better than expected — took 58% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
Anne van Roden / Jane Stonecipher
2022-02-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Gonzales
+0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2020-11-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Higginbotham
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2020-10-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Higginbotham
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2020-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Higginbotham
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 57% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Gundeep Singh / Victoria Youngmixed
2020-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Higginbotham
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Pam MacDuff / Nancy Heywood
2020-02-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darlene Jones
0.007below expectation — took 45% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Suanty Kaghan / Kay Kim
2020-02-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Higginbotham
0.005about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Shawna Dash / Margaret Galante Eskenazi
2020-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Higginbotham
0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2020-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Higginbotham
0.011below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2020-01-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Harris
0.001below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.