← Search

Claudia Ciobanu

Salem, OR
5.0S year-end 2026
61 matches · 46W–15L · seasons 2019–2023
Where Claudia sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Claudia is one of 66 women at 5.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 5.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Claudia has been a steady 5.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

4.55.02019202020222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 66.5% of games
5.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 49.4% of games
10.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 55.2% of games
9.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history61 matches
W
John Doane / Colleen Sharkeymixed
2023-03-05 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Monson
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Sandra Barnes / Xavier Denismixed
2023-03-04 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Monson
+0.000below expectation — took 63% of games against 70% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-02-11 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Monson
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-02-04 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Monson
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Maggie Fiocchi / Ella Riddle
2023-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Sanja Lemes
−0.020below expectation — took 38% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Sophie van Den Aarssen / Katie Petersen
2022-03-25 · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Amy Juppenlatz Sweet
−0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Paige Polizois / Ashley Knecht
2022-03-13 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Lisa Stoica
+0.019better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2022-02-13 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Monson
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
MacKenzie Hotan / Yen Ly
2022-02-12 · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Shannon DeVall
−0.009below expectation — took 39% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ty Noimany
+0.000below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
MacKenzie Hotan
2022-02-05 · #1 Singles · 5.0
−0.019about as expected — took 67% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2022-01-30 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jon Monson
+0.000about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.