Search

Karen Mathews

Spokane, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
31 matches · 11W–20L · seasons 20222026
Where Karen sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Karen is one of 1013 women at 4.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 89% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Karen has been 4.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.0202220232024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Karen has gone from the 9th to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
33.3%
6W–12L · 43.9% of games
8.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history31 matches
L
Wendy Teets / Liz Enyeart
2025-10-18 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marie Fitzpatrick
0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Kristen Towell / Michele Beaman
2025-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Crowson
0.014about as expected — took 60% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2024-08-10 · #1 Doubles · with Julene Osborn
0.001about as expected — took 42% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2024-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Laura Cremers
0.016below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Cathy Crowson
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Tricia Diebner / Collette Jarvelin
2024-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marie Fitzpatrick
+0.045better than expected — took 65% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Susan Massey / Maria Uy
2024-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aimee Hata
0.038below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Judy Knox / Leslie Inman
2024-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kiersten Shelby
0.048below expectation — took 20% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Courtenay Dey / Michele Dearing
2024-05-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kiersten Shelby
+0.004about as expected — took 44% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Megan Miller / Melanie Reddingchamps
2024-04-20 · #1 Doubles · with Samantha Mathews
0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Katherine Karlson / Keely Kopetzchamps
2024-04-19 · #2 Doubles · with Samantha Mathews
+0.002about as expected — took 52% of games against 52% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
Alyssa Fitzgerald / Caitlin Hicks
2024-03-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Mathews
0.030below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.