Emily Radner
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Hazel Park, MI
200 matches · 149W–51L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history200 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2019–2025
1EAST-MONTE 4.5+ women win singles SEM
1EAST-Monte 85 WOMEN COMBO
2BT-DEEN 45NW MO 40&O SEM
2EAST-KEAN 9.0 MIXED 40&O SEM
2EAST-MONTE win tri 45 40 35 W SEM F2
3BT-ROSEN 80MIX 18&O SEM F3
4EAST-MONTE 45NW WE 18&O SEM
4EAST-MONTE WOMEN HIGH 50 45 40 TRI SEM
5SCWB- Jam 75 WOMEN COMBO F2
EAST-WARNER 85 COMBO MIX W/E SEM
1EAST-KEAN 18&O MIX 8.0 SEM F1
3BLOOM-EBERT 18&O TU 40 NW SEM F3
3EAST-KEAN 8.0 MIXED 40&O SEM F2
3EAST-MONTE JAN TRI-LEVEL 45 40 35 Women SEM
4BLOOM-BARLOW AD40&O TH 40 NW SEM F3
4EAST-MONTE 18&O AUG TRI 50,45,40 WOMEN SEM
5EAST-MONTE 85WOMEN SEM
5FAC-JAM 75 WOMEN SEM F4
6FAC-MACHUS AD18&O MO 40 AMW SEM
2EAST-MONTE 8.5W COMBO SEM F2
2FAC-MAHMOOD Mixed 40&O 8.0 SEM F3
2WESS-GONTE TRI-LEVEL W AUG 454035 SEM F2
3EAST-MONTE SEM Tri-Level Showdown W 95 85 75
4BLOOM-FARWELL 4.0W TEAM SINGLES FALL SEM F1
5FAC-JAM 7.5W COMBO SEM F4
6BT-EBERT AD18&O 40NW TU SEM F1
6EAST-KEAN MIX18&O 80 SEM F3
1BT-EBERT 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F4
1SCWB-FARRELL 40 W/E WOMEN SINGLES SEM F1
1WESS-TANGUAY 8.0 mix 40&O SEM f2
2FAC-JAM 75 W/E WOMEN SEM F5
2WESS-TANGUAY 9.0 18&O MIXED SEM F1
3TROY-DUNN 85 W/E WOMEN SEM F2
4FAC-ROSS 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F4
5NAC-LIONAS 45NW 18&O AD WED SEM F2
5WESS-TANGUAY 9.0 mix 40&O SEM
6WESS-KAZANJIAN 40NW 40&O AD THURS SEM F4
1FAC-ROSS 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F3
2BLOOM-PETHERICK 40NW 18&O AD TUES SEM F3
3WESS-TANGUAY 9.0 18&O MIXED SEM F1
3WESS-TANGUAY W tri-level 35 40 45 SEM
4FAC-KAZANJIAN 85 WW COMBO SEM F2
5WESS-TANGUAY 75 WW COMBO SEM F3
1FAC-KAZANJIAN 40nw 18 tues sem F1
1FAC-KAZANJIAN 85 WOMEN COMBO SEM
6WESS-clay cts-TANGUAY 75 WOMEN COMBO SEM F4
1FAC-KAZANJIAN 85 combo women SEM F3
1WESS-TANGUAY clay courts 75 combo women SEM F6
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
4.0
79.2%
61W–16L · 64% of games
4.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 55.8% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.6% of games
8.0mixed
81%
17W–4L · 59.1% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
33 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.