Steven Owens
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Plymouth, MI
117 matches · 49W–68L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history117 matches
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 4-6
W
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-6
L
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2019–2024
5SCWB-WEINGARDEN AD40&O TH 40 MEN SEM F3
1FAC-BARTHOLOMEW MIX18&O 80 SEM F2
2FAC-BARTHOLOMEW Mixed 40&O 8.0 SEM F2
1FAC-BYER 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F3
3FAC-BARTHOLOMEW 8.0 mix 40&O SEM f3
4FAC-BARTHOLOMEW 8.0 18&O MIXED SEM F3
4FAC-BYER 40M 40&O AD THURS SEM F3
2FAC-COYLE 8.0 40&O Mixed SEM F2
2FAC-ROSKO 40M 18&O AD TUES SEM F4
4FAC-BYER 7.0 40&O Mixed SEM F3
5FAC-BYER 40M 40&O AD THURS SEM F3
1FAC-COYLE 40&OVER 80MIX F3
2FAC-ECKERT MSING 40M WIN F3
3FAC-BYER 75 MEN COMBO SEM F2
3FAC-COYLE 80mix 18 sem F1
3FAC-ROSKO 40m 18 tues sem F3
4FAC-BYER 40&OVER 70MIX F4
1FAC-BYER 40MEN 40 THUR SEM F4
1FAC-BYER 70 mix 40&O sem f4
1FAC-BYER 85 combo men SEM F3
2FAC-BYER 75 combo men SEM F3
2FAC-ROSKO 40MEN 18 TUES SEM F5
3FAC-ROSKO 35MEN 18 MON SEM F6
4FAC-BYER 35msing winwe sem f3
5FAC-BYER 35MEN 40 WED SEM F2
5FAC-ROSS 80 mix 40&O sem f2
6LIVY-COYLE 8.0 mix 18&O sem f2
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
77.8%
14W–4L · 58.8% of games
4.0
22.5%
9W–31L · 39.9% of games
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 45.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
30 matches
#1 Singles
8%
9 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.