← Search

Sabrina Sutherland

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Madison, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 90W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2026. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history200 matches
W
2026-10-04 · Bradshaw, Lynn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Barnes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-09-27 · Bradshaw, Lynn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angie DeLeon
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-31 · Bradshaw, Lynn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Becky Pardue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Bradshaw, Lynn · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Becky Pardue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jamie Page
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Germany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Cumberland championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Cumberland championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-17 · Rector, Stacie · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Page
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · Galey, Amanda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitch Stentiford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-2
W
2026-05-27 · Rector, Stacie · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Elizabeth Randall
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-21 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randy Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
60%
3W–2L · 52.7% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
63.2%
43W–25L · 53.6% of games
4.0
31.7%
20W–43L · 40.3% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
45.7%
16W–19L · 47.8% of games
8.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 31.8% of games
3.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
76 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
74 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
47 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams