← Search

Julie Ray

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greenwood, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 3W–11L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history14 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A40 3.5W CGMSN Heath · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Peterson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Indy A40 3.5W CGMSN Heath · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Peterson
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Indy A40 3.5W CGMSN Heath · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Saunders
loading the estimate
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-22 · Indy A40 3.5W CGMSN Heath · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paula Peterson
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Indy A40 3.5W CGMSN Heath · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Connie Allen
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-06-01 · Indy A40 3.5W CGMSN Heath · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Bush-Cooper
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Klutts
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-06-27 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Bush-Cooper
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Klutts
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Klutts
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Klutts
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2024-07-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Klutts
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 34.8% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer