Search

Eric Le

Newcastle, WA
0.0 year-end
52 matches · 27W–25L · seasons 20192022
Where Eric sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

Eric is one of 0 men at 0.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 0.0 account for 100% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Eric has been a steady 4.5 across all 4 seasons on record.

4.04.52019202020212022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Eric has gone from the 63rd to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2021.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
59.4%
19W–13L · 53.4% of games
5.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
L
2022-01-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bally Bang
0.026below expectation — took 48% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-01-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kolt Kaneshiro
0.007about as expected — took 57% of games against 59% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Miho Slavik / Mike Wilsonmixed
2021-10-30 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Holly Ng
+0.000below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Ashley Moise / Jeff Chaneymixed
2021-09-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Holly Ng
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2021-08-15 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Debiec
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-08-01 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Debiec
+0.000about as expected — took 44% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2021-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Debiec
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Holly Yang / Jeff Servossmixed
2021-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ping Yeh
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 60% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Anhtu Hoang / Paul Brown
2021-07-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marco Sobrino
0.010below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Joshua Glick / Michael Fleming
2021-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Loic Deniel
0.049below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Devin Anderson / Jim Vana
2021-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ryan Cho
+0.020better than expected — took 50% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Michael Joung / Anand Rajeswaran
2021-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Juhn
0.022about as expected — took 63% of games against 68% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.