← Search

Dan Hagin

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 29W–45L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history74 matches
L
2026-03-18 · SUN CITY SUMMERLIN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hakan
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-03-04 · SUN CITY SUMMERLIN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Gillespie
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-25 · SUN CITY SUMMERLIN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Hakan
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-28 · SUN CITY SUMMERLIN · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Chris Surico
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-14 · SUN CITY SUMMERLIN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Kraus
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-26 · SUN CITY SUMMERLIN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Wood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-01-29 · SUN CITY SUMMERLIN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Wood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-15 · SUN CITY SUMMERLIN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Carelli
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-01-08 · SUN CITY SUMMERLIN · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Wood
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2023-10-21 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jose Despujos Cardillo
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-10-20 · SPANISH OAKS #1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Hartman
loading the estimate
5-6
L
2023-10-07 · SPANISH OAKS · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Albert
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
42.9%
21W–28L · 47.1% of games
6.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 39.1% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.4% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#1 Male Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Male Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams