← Search

Jackie Armstrong

Kent, WA
2.5C year-end 2024
57 matches · 16W–41L · seasons 2019–2024
Where Jackie sits
176
2.5
1468
3.0
1702
3.5
1076
4.0
441
4.5
72
5.0

Jackie is one of 176 women at 2.5 in this cohort of 4935. Levels at or below 2.5 account for 4% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jackie has been 2.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.02.520192020202120222024

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Jackie has gone from the 22nd to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
37.1%
13W–22L · 45.6% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
0%
0W–8L · 28% of games
6.0mixed
25%
3W–9L · 42.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history57 matches
L
Christina Vanburen / Kelly Ambrose
2024-02-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffany Hicks
−0.045below expectation — took 28% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2024-01-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Markham
−0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Penny Jay / Angela Ratcliff
2023-10-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Dubuque
−0.016below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Sara Kuhl / Mary Dolan
2023-10-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Markham
+0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2023-10-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Dubuque
+0.003about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2023-09-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mary Jordan
−0.057below expectation — took 14% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Davis
−0.028below expectation — took 8% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
2022-05-13 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Casey
−0.005about as expected — took 71% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2022-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Bussell
+0.064better than expected — took 29% of games against 13% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Jutta Lipsky / Elena Alina Serbanescu
2022-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Wendy Cunningham
−0.023below expectation — took 20% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Sella Subramanian / Suzanne Vannatter
2022-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda McKay
−0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2022-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Amanda McKay
−0.032below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.