Teams

DTC #6

2025 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 40 & OVER · 3.5 MEN- 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-09vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Miranda / Scott Hopson vs Bill Bosnos / Keith Morgan6-2, 6-3
2025-03-08vs DTC #2Split 11
L#2 DoublesScott Hopson / James Miranda vs Colin Haas / Charles Jones0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesIvan Farris / Riley Judd vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-22vs DTC #4Lost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Hopson / Gerald Radford vs Edward Stephens / BYRON NOWELLS3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesIvan Farris / Mark Truman vs Thomas Schinabeck / Curtis Saludes5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNicholas Vernetti / Clint Ramos vs Tim Austin / Michael Holcomb1-6, 1-6
2025-02-15vs RED ROCK CCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesNicholas Vernetti vs Daniel Hsueh0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesIvan Farris / Mark Truman vs Dan Hale / David Schlatter6-4, 7-5
2025-02-08vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Lost 02
L#1 DoublesIvan Farris / Riley Judd vs Michael Gleason / Brad Cunningham5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesScott Hopson / James Miranda vs Erick Sanchez / James Hill1-6, 2-6
2025-02-01vs DTC #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBenjamin Lengson / Gerald Radford vs Alan Hernandez Jarvis / Steve Horton2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesNicholas Vernetti vs Michael Moses0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesScott Hopson / Clint Ramos vs Gene Lonardo / Gianni Del Vecchio2-6, 1-6
2025-01-25vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSLost 12
L#1 DoublesIvan Farris / Gerald Radford vs Matthew Gayheart / Adam Austin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNicholas Vernetti vs Wael Eid6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Miranda / Scott Hopson vs Erich Moxley / Garth Gamble7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-18vs DTC #4Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Miranda / Scott Hopson vs Thomas Schinabeck / Curtis Saludes3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesClint Ramos / Rod Atamian vs Tim Austin / Michael Holcomb3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMark Truman / Ivan Farris vs Gaetano Franceschi / JD de Armond7-5, 6-3
2025-01-11vs RED ROCK CCLost 02
L#1 DoublesScott Hopson / Ivan Farris vs Gregory Dorn / Pej Sabet6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNicholas Vernetti vs Chris Chapman4-6, 6-7
2025-01-04vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Lost 13
L#1 DoublesScott Hopson / Riley Judd vs Russell Terao / Onidio Mirabal1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNicholas Vernetti vs James Hill7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGerald Radford / Alvin Sabas vs Michael Gleason / Brad Cunningham5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBenjamin Lengson / Ivan Farris vs Erick Sanchez / Mauricio Vejar1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN- 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Joe Wirth
published
Nicholas Vernetti
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.22
Ivan Farris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.17
Clint Ramos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
James Miranda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.03
Alvin Sabas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Scott Hopson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.97
Riley Judd
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.79
Benjamin Lengson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
Mark Truman
published
Rod Atamian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Clint Ramos + Joe Wirth3451% games+4.9% vs expected
Benjamin Lengson + Mark Truman4251% games−0.6% vs expected
Benjamin Lengson + Ivan Farris4746% games−8.9% vs expected
Benjamin Lengson + Nicholas Vernetti4163% gamesnot enough data
Benjamin Lengson + Clint Ramos314 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Lengson + Scott Hopson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joe Wirth
31W–19L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Nicholas Vernetti
115W–89L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ivan Farris
142W–117L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Clint Ramos
119W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
James Miranda
43W–54L career · 8 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Alvin Sabas
89W–85L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Scott Hopson
71W–63L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.00
Riley Judd
29W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Benjamin Lengson
130W–96L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Mark Truman
18W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rod Atamian
26W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.