Teams

DTC #4

2025 USTA ADULT LEAGUE 40 & OVER · 3.5 MEN- 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.43 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-03-08vs RED ROCK CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Schinabeck / Curtis Saludes vs Pej Sabet / Arthur Williams6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJunghyun Yang / Michael Holcomb vs Dennis Wertzler / JOHN MacDONALD4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGetnet Fikre / Mark Tarantan vs COLE BOREN / Dan Hale2-6, 6-7
2025-03-01vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Schinabeck / Curtis Saludes vs Michael Gleason / Brad Cunningham6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJunghyun Yang vs Stephen Knightlinger6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJD de Armond / BYRON NOWELLS vs Mauricio Vejar / James Hill1-6, 3-6
2025-02-22vs DTC #6Won 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Schinabeck / Curtis Saludes vs Ivan Farris / Mark Truman7-5, 6-1
2025-02-15vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSWon 20
W#1 SinglesJunghyun Yang vs Benjamin Kott6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJD de Armond / Curtis Saludes vs Jordan Raub / Keith Morgan6-4, 6-2
2025-02-08vs DTC #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Schinabeck / Curtis Saludes vs Charles Jones / Tony Cimber4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJunghyun Yang vs Alan Hernandez Jarvis6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael Holcomb / JD de Armond vs Colin Haas / Steve Horton5-7, 2-6
2025-02-01vs RED ROCK CCWon 21
W#1 SinglesJunghyun Yang vs Daniel Hsueh7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCurtis Saludes / Thomas Schinabeck vs Gregory Dorn / COLE BOREN6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJD de Armond / John Shook vs Pej Sabet / Dan Hale1-6, 4-6
2025-01-25vs LIFE TIME FITNESS/GV #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesThomas Schinabeck / Curtis Saludes vs Michael Gleason / Erick Sanchez6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJunghyun Yang vs James Hill6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJD de Armond / John Shook vs Russell Terao / Mauricio Vejar6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-01-18vs DTC #6Won 21
W#1 DoublesThomas Schinabeck / Curtis Saludes vs James Miranda / Scott Hopson6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJunghyun Yang vs Gerald Radford6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGaetano Franceschi / JD de Armond vs Mark Truman / Ivan Farris5-7, 3-6
2025-01-11vs SOUTHERN HIGHLANDSWon 20
W#1 SinglesJunghyun Yang vs Jordan Raub6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJD de Armond / John Shook vs Larry Gilmore / Marc Badain6-3, 6-1
2025-01-04vs DTC #2Lost 03
L#1 DoublesEdward Stephens / Getnet Fikre vs Charles Jones / Wade Richardson2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJunghyun Yang vs Michael Moses1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesOskar Dagys / Tim Austin vs Gene Lonardo / Tony Cimber3-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 MEN- 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Junghyun Yang
usually #1 Singles 62%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.49
Oskar Dagys
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Michael Holcomb
published
3.33
Curtis Saludes
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.30
John Shook
published
BYRON NOWELLS
published 3.5
3.23
JD de Armond
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.16
Thomas Schinabeck
published
3.02
Mark Tarantan
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.96
Getnet Fikre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Tim Austin
published
Edward Stephens
published
Gaetano Franceschi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JD de Armond + Michael Holcomb7068% games+12.2% vs expected
Curtis Saludes + Thomas Schinabeck9755% games+8.3% vs expected
Edward Stephens + Tim Austin8653% games−2.5% vs expected
Edward Stephens + Thomas Schinabeck0540% games−5.4% vs expected
Edward Stephens + Curtis Saludes3253% gamesnot enough data
JD de Armond + Oskar Dagys5079% gamesnot enough data
Curtis Saludes + Tim Austin213 matchesnot enough data
Curtis Saludes + JD de Armond213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Junghyun Yang
90W–51L career · 13 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Oskar Dagys
26W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Michael Holcomb
61W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Curtis Saludes
84W–48L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
John Shook
130W–116L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.30
3.5
BYRON NOWELLS
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
JD de Armond
121W–90L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Thomas Schinabeck
95W–117L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Mark Tarantan
108W–112L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Getnet Fikre
55W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Tim Austin
21W–33L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.94
Edward Stephens
28W–49L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gaetano Franceschi
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.