Teams

CM GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs WP-G PURPLESplit 22
W#1 DoublesKathy Ammann / Megan Fredricks vs Jennifer Digan / Alison Mueller4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMegan Robert vs Cameran Jewell3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Doubet / Jennifer Malen vs Tara Wiebe / Kala Koehn3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeth Hasse / Jane Miceli vs Sarah Warsh / Bethany Benish7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-07vs GPTC REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesMegan Draper / Megan Fredricks vs Amy Parent / Wendy Berhman6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMegan Robert vs Renee Morris6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBeth Hasse / Anne Doubet vs Molly Holland / Heather Colliander1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHolly Flannigan / Jane Miceli vs Kristin Baird / Caroline Walker6-2, 6-3
2025-06-30vs SKY GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesMegan Fredricks / Megan Draper vs Jocelyn Murphy / Lynn Bouck6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMegan Robert vs Erin Mann0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Hasse / Jennifer Malen vs Sara Visser / Denise Briere1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHolly Flannigan / Jane Miceli vs Paula Daukas / Cynthia Frandsen6-4, 6-2
2025-06-23vs WP-C REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Malen / Holly Flannigan vs Jennifer Pollman / Kate Marshall3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMegan Draper vs Johanna Bentson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Hasse / Anne Doubet vs Caren Elenowitz / Kim Eikenberry6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Miceli / Megan Robert vs Erin Schlosser / Laura Hylton5-7, 1-6
2025-06-16vs DTP GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesHolly Flannigan / Megan Fredricks vs Meredith Giske / Barbara Vander Wall6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKathy Ammann vs Kim Weeks2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAnne Doubet / Megan Robert vs Choon Lee / Emily Yuan6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJane Miceli / Jennifer Malen vs Skeeter Buck / Liz Markland2-6, 5-7
2025-06-09vs DTC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMegan Draper / Megan Fredricks vs Kelli Barton / Evelyn Price6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMegan Robert vs Lisa Ehrlich6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Malen / Holly Flannigan vs Brenda Byrne / Heather la Montagne1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Hasse / Karen Hansen vs Alexis Sutton / Ashley Stevens1-6, 2-6
2025-06-02vs CACM BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesMegan Draper / Megan Fredricks vs Neda Rasouli / Kelly Kurtz6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKathy Ammann vs Ellie Carothers Kelly2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Robert / Beth Hasse vs Amanda Sheehan / Christina Ziccardi1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJane Miceli / Anne Doubet vs Sarah Payne / Maya Pingle Trinen1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Megan Fredricks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Megan Draper
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.78
Holly Flannigan
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.76
Jane Miceli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Kathy Ammann
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Megan Robert
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.51
Beth Hasse
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Anne Doubet
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.48
Jennifer Malen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Doubet + Beth Hasse3741% games−3.1% vs expected
Anne Doubet + Kathy Ammann044 matchesnot enough data
Megan Draper + Megan Fredricks314 matchesnot enough data
Jane Miceli + Anne Doubet123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Megan Fredricks
53W–20L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Megan Draper
13W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
Holly Flannigan
9W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Jane Miceli
11W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Kathy Ammann
55W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Megan Robert
60W–88L career · 7 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Beth Hasse
10W–21L career · type A · 6 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
3
Anne Doubet
33W–45L career · 5 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Jennifer Malen
7W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.