Teams

WP-G PURPLE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs CM GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Digan / Alison Mueller vs Kathy Ammann / Megan Fredricks6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCameran Jewell vs Megan Robert6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTara Wiebe / Kala Koehn vs Anne Doubet / Jennifer Malen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Warsh / Bethany Benish vs Beth Hasse / Jane Miceli7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-07vs CACM BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesCameran Jewell / Jennifer Digan vs Kelly Kurtz / Neda Rasouli0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Warsh / Tara Wiebe vs Shanna Weber / Amanda Sheehan7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBethany Benish / Kimberlly Chhor vs Maya Pingle Trinen / Christina Ziccardi6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-30vs GPTC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesTara Wiebe / Krissy Eckelberger vs Julie Pellet / Christy Wilson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKala Koehn / Jennifer Digan vs Wendy Berhman / Caroline Walker4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKimberlly Chhor / Bethany Benish vs Shannon Brooks / Kristin Baird6-1, 6-2
2025-06-23vs SKY GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesTara Wiebe / Sarah Warsh vs Pam Price / Beth Godzich4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAlison Mueller vs Lynn Bouck6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKala Koehn / Kimberlly Chhor vs Erin Mann / Jennifer Fitzgerald4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJennifer Digan / Krissy Eckelberger vs Paula Daukas / Cynthia Frandsen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-16vs WP-C REDWon 21
L#1 SinglesJennifer Digan vs Molly Withers6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTara Wiebe / Sarah Warsh vs Anne Sibree / Jennifer Pollman6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBethany Benish / Kimberlly Chhor vs Sara Singh / Johanna Bentson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-09vs DTP GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlison Mueller / Cameran Jewell vs Brae Holdridge - (DQ) / Kim Weeks4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAllison Malesky / Tara Wiebe vs Meredith Giske / Elizabeth Russell6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKimberlly Chhor / Kala Koehn vs Skeeter Buck / Liz Markland5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-06-02vs DTC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Digan / Alison Mueller vs Brenda Byrne / Jennifer Parsons6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAngie Demetulias vs Heather la Montagne6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCameran Jewell / Kala Koehn vs Kelli Barton / Evelyn Price4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Warsh / Allison Malesky vs Alexis Sutton / Ashley Stevens5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Alison Mueller
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Angie Demetulias
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Allison Malesky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Cameran Jewell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Kimberlly Chhor
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.79
Jennifer Digan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Autumn Shraiberg
published 3
2.71
Tara Wiebe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Bethany Benish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Kala Koehn
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.41
Sarah Warsh
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Krissy Eckelberger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberlly Chhor + Allison Malesky9166% games+10.6% vs expected
Tara Wiebe + Sarah Warsh1636% games−4.2% vs expected
Kimberlly Chhor + Bethany Benish4155% gamesnot enough data
Kala Koehn + Sarah Warsh044 matchesnot enough data
Kala Koehn + Kimberlly Chhor134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Digan + Alison Mueller213 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Warsh + Bethany Benish123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Mueller
23W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Angie Demetulias
18W–12L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Allison Malesky
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Cameran Jewell
55W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
Kimberlly Chhor
20W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
Jennifer Digan
26W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Autumn Shraiberg
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Tara Wiebe
53W–65L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Bethany Benish
15W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Kala Koehn
8W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Sarah Warsh
6W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
Krissy Eckelberger
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.