Teams

GPTC RED

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs DTC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJulie Pellet / Renee Morris vs Kwai Kendall Grove / Elizabeth Sipes3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesChristy Wilson vs Jennifer Parsons6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWendy Berhman / Amy Parent vs Ashley Stevens / Kelli Barton7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMolly Holland / Caroline Walker vs Alexis Sutton / Alyson Kempton0-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs CM GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesAmy Parent / Wendy Berhman vs Megan Draper / Megan Fredricks3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesRenee Morris vs Megan Robert3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMolly Holland / Heather Colliander vs Beth Hasse / Anne Doubet1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristin Baird / Caroline Walker vs Holly Flannigan / Jane Miceli2-6, 3-6
2025-06-30vs WP-G PURPLEWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulie Pellet / Christy Wilson vs Tara Wiebe / Krissy Eckelberger6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesHeather Colliander vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Berhman / Caroline Walker vs Kala Koehn / Jennifer Digan6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesShannon Brooks / Kristin Baird vs Kimberlly Chhor / Bethany Benish1-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs CACM BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesRenee Morris / Julie Pellet vs Sarah Payne / Amanda Sheehan6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChristy Wilson vs AUSRA MOLLERUD0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Baird / Shannon Brooks vs Maya Pingle Trinen / Shanna Weber6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Colliander / Caroline Walker vs Kelly Kurtz / Neda Rasouli1-6, 1-6
2025-06-16vs SKY GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesShannon Brooks / Julie Pellet vs Shannon Tiger / Pam Price6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChristy Wilson vs Silke Larson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRenee Morris / Heather Colliander vs Denise Briere / Jennifer Fitzgerald4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMolly Holland / Kristin Baird vs Lynn Bouck / Beth Godzich2-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs WP-C REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Parent / Christy Wilson vs Caren Elenowitz / Kim Eikenberry7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJulie Pellet vs Laura Hylton6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWendy Berhman / Shannon Brooks vs Sara Singh / Johanna Bentson6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMolly Holland / Kristin Baird vs Jennifer Pollman / Jessica Craig1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-02vs DTP GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesShannon Brooks / Wendy Berhman vs Brae Holdridge - (DQ) / Kim Weeks1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChristy Wilson vs Meredith Giske2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Parent / Julie Pellet vs Elizabeth Russell / Barbara Vander Wall6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMolly Holland / Caroline Walker vs Skeeter Buck / Liz Waryn7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Wendy Berhman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.79
Christy Wilson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Shannon Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.72
Amy Parent
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Julie Pellet
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.60
Molly Holland
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.58
Renee Morris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.34
Kristin Baird
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.30
Heather Colliander
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jackie Coppola
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Colliander + Kristin Baird1635% games+0.4% vs expected
Julie Pellet + Amy Parent0540% games−1.5% vs expected
Wendy Berhman + Amy Parent151649% games−2.4% vs expected
Molly Holland + Kristin Baird1944% games−2.7% vs expected
Heather Colliander + Julie Pellet3645% games−5.5% vs expected
Shannon Brooks + Molly Holland2344% games−6.1% vs expected
Julie Pellet + Renee Morris4647% games−6.7% vs expected
Molly Holland + Renee Morris0536% games−9.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Wendy Berhman
52W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Christy Wilson
16W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Shannon Brooks
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Amy Parent
42W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Julie Pellet
28W–62L career · 6 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Molly Holland
6W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Renee Morris
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
2.5
Kristin Baird
12W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Heather Colliander
25W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
Jackie Coppola
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.