Teams

KY/LEX/ Pernice/Schaeffer

2024 USTA WINTER FUN LEAGUE 18 & OVER · Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-07vs Ky/Lex/Russ (non-playing captain)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLee Walker / Ann Albrecht vs Elizabeth Hardwick / Alexandra Demoss-Campbell6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDainn Park / Rhonda Hilton vs Monica King / Christie Eckerline6-0, 6-0
2024-02-23vs KY/LEX/NiWon 21
W#1 DoublesRhonda Hilton / Natalie Avant vs Davis Dickens / Lucy Butt6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Pernice vs Jordan Kiviniemi-Moore7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSophie Schmidt / Leah Lykins vs Patty Ni / Caroline Carter6-1, 6-3
2024-02-18vs Ky/Lex/Russ (non-playing captain)Won 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Pernice / Sophie Schmidt vs Alexandra Demoss-Campbell / Erin Shetler6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLee Walker vs Katrin Larrabee6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLeah Lykins / Kristi Martin vs Aya Tsuchiya / Monica King7-5, 6-2
2024-02-09vs KY/LEX/NiWon 21
L#1 DoublesNatalie Avant / Rhonda Hilton vs Lucy Butt / Ruth Anna Swacker1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSophie Schmidt vs Jordan Kiviniemi-Moore6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLeah Lykins / Madison Liford vs Amy Johns / Lee Ann Sheehy6-1, 6-0
2024-02-01vs Ky/Lex/Russ (non-playing captain)Won 21
W#1 DoublesShannon Schaeffer / Sophie Schmidt vs Elizabeth Hardwick / Christie Eckerline6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDainn Park vs Erin Shetler6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLeah Lykins / Natalie Avant vs Monica King / Aya Tsuchiya2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2024-01-15vs KY/LEX/NiWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadison Liford / Natalie Avant vs Amy Johns / Lee Ann Sheehy6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDainn Park vs Meredith Ginn Lam3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Albrecht / Rhonda Hilton vs Patty Ni / Caroline Carter6-1, 6-1
2024-01-13vs Ky/Lex/Russ (non-playing captain)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKristi Martin / Natalie Avant vs Elizabeth Hardwick / Alexandra Demoss-Campbell4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Albrecht vs Aya Tsuchiya2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Lykins / Jennifer Trimble vs Heidi Mella / Sarah Pearson4-6, 6-7
2024-01-02vs KY/LEX/NiLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Saini / Shannon Schaeffer vs Lucy Butt / Ruth Anna Swacker0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLee Walker vs Davis Dickens3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMadison Liford / Dainn Park vs Natalie Carlisle / Ashley Gillispie6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/ Pernice/Schaeffer6216819160
2KY/LEX/Ni3591532209
3Ky/Lex/Russ (non-playing captain)35101433240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Sophie Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Dainn Park
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Emily Pernice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Lee Walker
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Lauren Saini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Madison Liford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Natalie Avant
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.81
Kristi Martin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Ann Albrecht
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Rhonda Hilton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Leah Lykins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Schaeffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Walker + Ann Albrecht17559% games+6.6% vs expected
Kristi Martin + Leah Lykins4353% games+5.6% vs expected
Madison Liford + Leah Lykins314 matchesnot enough data
Natalie Avant + Leah Lykins033 matchesnot enough data
Sophie Schmidt + Emily Pernice123 matchesnot enough data
Leah Lykins + Ann Albrecht123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophie Schmidt
46W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Dainn Park
61W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Emily Pernice
53W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
Lee Walker
102W–33L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.19
Lauren Saini
18W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Madison Liford
33W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.92
Natalie Avant
23W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.83
Kristi Martin
55W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Ann Albrecht
55W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Rhonda Hilton
59W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
Leah Lykins
52W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
Shannon Schaeffer
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.