Teams

C 7.5W A PW2 DeWerth

2022 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 7.5W Combo Spring

15 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-09vs C 7.5W A NR WissmanLost 02
L#2 DoublesNancy Koehler / Jeanne MacKay vs Lynne Hanna / Kym Rokas6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Simonton / Cindy Malixi vs Pamela McNally / J Kennedy2-6, 3-6
2022-04-02vs C 7.5W A AO BartramLost 02
L#1 DoublesJeanne MacKay / Sarah Boswell vs Irene Slattery / Karen Kneiss2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesFiona Harwood / Linda Simonton vs Yue Bruckner / Julia Bartram2-6, 4-6
2022-03-26vs C 7.5W B CV CasamentoLost 01
L#3 DoublesDiane Blesi / Linda Simonton vs Laura Cass / Constance Croasdaile2-6, 2-6
2022-03-20vs C 7.5W A PW1 AtkinsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bucheit / Linda Simonton vs Kathleen Kmiecik / Megan Kelly1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFiona Harwood / Jeanne MacKay vs Kit Quigley / Rochelle Sladek0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Boswell / Cindy Malixi vs Debora Ksenich / Nicole Mikolich1-6, 0-6
2022-03-19vs C 7.5W B MCRC AranavageLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bucheit / Fiona Harwood vs Kathleen Aranavage / Deanne Gibson5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeanne MacKay / Nancy Koehler vs Patricia Mercuri / Rachel Wright4-6, 2-6
2022-03-12vs C 7.5W B WE NiehenkeLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bucheit / Linda Simonton vs Maureen Brichmann / Kelley Clegg5-7, 4-6
2022-03-05vs C 7.5W B WR DaberkoLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Began / Jeanne MacKay vs Angela Lewis / Mina Choi3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesFiona Harwood / Cindy Malixi vs Allison Sency / Jodi Wolff3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bucheit / Linda Simonton vs Leslie Nutt / Kathleen Daberko3-6, 3-6
2022-02-12vs C 7.5W A NR WissmanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeanne MacKay / Kate Began vs Stacey Varuolo / Pam Stepnick5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLacey Hood / Katherine Reid vs Lauren Castagnero / Katie Rummel4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDiane Blesi / Linda Simonton vs Lisa Wissman / Dace Zemzars1-6, 3-6
2022-02-05vs C 7.5W A AO BartramSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Bucheit / Fiona Harwood vs Allison Evans / Elizabeth Caldera2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeanne MacKay / Nancy Koehler vs Samantha Jameson / Karen Kariotakis6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA 7.5W Combo Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W CC Horgan82171330278
2OH NEO C 7.5W Hendricks7321924227
3C 7.5W A AO Bartram73181232250
4C 7.5W B WR Daberko64171328264
5C 7.5W A PW1 Atkinson64171332281
6C 7.5W SP DeLuca64171333277
7C 7.5W B WE Niehenke55171328264
8C 7.5W A NR Wissman55171330252
9C 7.5W B MCRC Aranavage55161433278
10C 7.5W B CV Casamento46121840301
11C 7.5W LT Galehouse37121839288
12C 7.5W GR Johnson37121841323
13C 7.5W TP Schaffner37111944325
14C 7.5W A PW2 DeWerth2862450342

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Allison Welch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.74
Kate Began
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.44
Jennifer Bucheit
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Sarah Boswell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Cindy Malixi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Nancy Koehler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Fiona Harwood
published 3.5
3.08
Ann Dewerth
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.02
Anjela Hindman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Reid
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Diane Blesi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.64
Lisa Fallon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Jeanne MacKay
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Lacey Hood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Simonton
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Welch + Kate Began7161% games+4.5% vs expected
Lisa Fallon + Anjela Hindman4254% games−0.3% vs expected
Nancy Koehler + Katherine Reid71149% games−1.7% vs expected
Jennifer Bucheit + Sarah Boswell7252% games−1.9% vs expected
Katherine Reid + Ann Dewerth203045% games−2.3% vs expected
Nancy Koehler + Sarah Boswell1543% games−6.4% vs expected
Sarah Boswell + Ann Dewerth4253% gamesnot enough data
Linda Simonton + Jennifer Bucheit1437% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Welch
56W–42L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Kate Began
62W–39L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Jennifer Bucheit
24W–40L career · 5 lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
Sarah Boswell
64W–48L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Cindy Malixi
6W–17L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Koehler
56W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
3.5
Fiona Harwood
26W–33L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ann Dewerth
60W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3.5
Anjela Hindman
66W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
Katherine Reid
117W–141L career · 6 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Diane Blesi
185W–128L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
Lisa Fallon
65W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Jeanne MacKay
54W–49L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lacey Hood
18W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Linda Simonton
21W–27L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.