Teams

C 7.5W B WE Niehenke

2022 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 7.5W Combo Spring

20 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-04-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAbigail Daroff / Elaine Niehenke vs Marybeth Esposito / Rachel Wright2-6, 4-6
2022-04-02vs C 7.5W B CV CasamentoWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Alexander / Maureen Brichmann vs Jill Carroll / Julie Brubaker6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJillian Fetzner / Monique Sacks vs Stacy Casamento / Lisa Dowling4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKelley Clegg / Sandra Dively vs Laura Cass / Nancy Kinnett6-2, 6-2
2022-03-26vs C 7.5W A NR WissmanLost 12
W#1 DoublesLindsay Lodge / Katie Allan vs Lynne Hanna / J Kennedy7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelley Clegg / Sandra Dively vs Lisa Wissman / Dace Zemzars4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Nelson / Alison Lee vs Sherry Rohweder / Kym Rokas4-6, 4-6
2022-03-19vs C 7.5W A AO BartramLost 02
L#1 DoublesRebecca Alexander / Erica Richardson vs Yue Bruckner / Annette Lipaj0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShannan Holodinski / Anna Nelson vs Julia Bartram / Amy Grace7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-13vs C 7.5W B WR DaberkoWon 30
W#1 DoublesNadia Wearsch / Erica Richardson vs Courtney Foster / Arminda Parker6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelley Clegg / Maureen Brichmann vs Leslie Nutt / Andrea Wangenheim6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLindsay Lodge / Monique Sacks vs Kathy Rinicella / Marcia Roberts6-1, 6-1
2022-03-12vs C 7.5W A PW2 DeWerthWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Brichmann / Kelley Clegg vs Jennifer Bucheit / Linda Simonton7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAbigail Daroff / Amy Burtnett vs Sarah Boswell / Kate Began7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Nelson / Shannan Holodinski vs Ann Dewerth / Katherine Reid7-5, 6-3
2022-03-05vs C 7.5W A PW1 AtkinsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaureen Brichmann / Nadia Wearsch vs Debora Ksenich / Sara Verespej0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Alexander / Anna Nelson vs Karen Lanigan / Megan Kelly6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartha Meyer / Amy Burtnett vs Susan Geringer / Nicole Mikolich6-4, 6-0
2022-02-26vs C 7.5W B WR DaberkoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatie Allan / Lindsay Lodge vs Angela Lewis / Lynn Krapf7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErica Richardson / Elizabeth Ries vs Caterina Petty / Kathleen Daberko3-6, 4-6
2022-02-12vs C 7.5W B MCRC AranavageSplit 11
L#2 DoublesElaine Niehenke / Abigail Daroff vs Carly Holloway / Kathleen Aranavage4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLindsay Lodge / Monique Sacks vs Tara Limestoll / Michelle Frederick4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-05vs C 7.5W B CV CasamentoWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatie Allan / Jillian Fetzner vs Dolly Herschel / Mickey Lopresti6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesErica Richardson / Nadia Wearsch vs Kelly Joyce / Susan Overholt6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA 7.5W Combo Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W CC Horgan82171330278
2OH NEO C 7.5W Hendricks7321924227
3C 7.5W A AO Bartram73181232250
4C 7.5W B WR Daberko64171328264
5C 7.5W A PW1 Atkinson64171332281
6C 7.5W SP DeLuca64171333277
7C 7.5W B WE Niehenke55171328264
8C 7.5W A NR Wissman55171330252
9C 7.5W B MCRC Aranavage55161433278
10C 7.5W B CV Casamento46121840301
11C 7.5W LT Galehouse37121839288
12C 7.5W GR Johnson37121841323
13C 7.5W TP Schaffner37111944325
14C 7.5W A PW2 DeWerth2862450342

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Elizabeth Ries
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Kristin Schron
published
3.77
Erica Richardson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Abigail Daroff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Martha Meyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Tiffany Fenner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Jillian Fetzner
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.37
Elaine Niehenke
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.36
Kelley Clegg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Amy Burtnett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Andrea Ayyappan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Anna Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Lindsay Lodge
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
3.00
Alison Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.94
Shannan Holodinski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Allan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maureen Brichmann
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Monique Sacks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nadia Wearsch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rebecca Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Ries + Jillian Fetzner6167% games+15.9% vs expected
Andrea Ayyappan + Kelley Clegg6073% games+14.3% vs expected
Rebecca Alexander + Kelley Clegg8167% games+13.5% vs expected
Elaine Niehenke + Jillian Fetzner15267% games+11.7% vs expected
Lindsay Lodge + Jillian Fetzner9457% games+9.7% vs expected
Elaine Niehenke + Kelley Clegg11262% games+9.1% vs expected
Alison Lee + Lindsay Lodge4356% games+8.9% vs expected
Erica Richardson + Martha Meyer7064% games+7.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Ries
104W–36L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
Kristin Schron
39W–33L career · no lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
3.82
4
Erica Richardson
115W–61L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Abigail Daroff
81W–62L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Meyer
36W–19L career · 1 line in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Tiffany Fenner
71W–62L career · 2 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Jillian Fetzner
100W–37L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Elaine Niehenke
132W–81L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Kelley Clegg
148W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Amy Burtnett
47W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Ayyappan
82W–69L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Anna Nelson
32W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lindsay Lodge
112W–89L career · 13 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Alison Lee
112W–94L career · 6 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.00
Shannan Holodinski
85W–83L career · 2 lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
Katie Allan
58W–30L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Brichmann
33W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Monique Sacks
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nadia Wearsch
52W–23L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Alexander
64W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.