Teams

C 7.5W SP DeLuca

2022 NEOTA Combo Spring · NEOTA 7.5W Combo Spring

18 players · average NTRP 3.81 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-04-09vs OH NEO C 7.5W HendricksLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheridah Renuart / Sarah Grauel vs Brenda Kekel / Pamela Hudson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLaurel Marsillo / Michelle Sutton vs Summer Wise / Andrea Theisler1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth DeLuca / Tonya Derrig vs AMY HENDRICKS / Kasey Bland6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-02vs C 7.5W CC HorganLost 12
L#1 DoublesCaroline Cooke / Michelle Sutton vs Mary Maleski / Natalie Marotta6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Grauel / Laurel Marsillo vs Susie Todaro / Marnie Walcutt6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEllie Effinger / Angela Snowball vs Margaret VanDine / Deborah Rachek4-6, 0-6
2022-03-26vs C 7.5W TP SchaffnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMAGGIE GRAY / Donna Reynolds vs Kristianne Bontempo / Kimberly Dickason6-2, 6-1
2022-03-19vs C 7.5W LT GalehouseWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Grauel / Elizabeth DeLuca vs Selena Kim / Christa Galehouse6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEllie Effinger / Tonya Derrig vs Alicia Blessing / Karen Sterling1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDella Michalos / Laurel Marsillo vs Donna Balc / Stephanie Teodosio6-4, 6-2
2022-03-12vs C 7.5W GR JohnsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesEllie Effinger / MAGGIE GRAY vs Jill Hanigofsky / Denise Fehr7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTonya Derrig / Patty Bennett vs Trisha Kohut / Renee Weaver6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth DeLuca / Della Michalos vs Loralee Daily / Marlene Pisanelli3-6, 5-7
2022-03-09vs C 7.5W GR JohnsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheridah Renuart / Sarah Grauel vs Jill Hanigofsky / Michelle Ross6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Sutton / Elizabeth DeLuca vs Michelle Simmons / Valerie Johnson4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesPatty Bennett / Catherine Krummel vs Melissa Owen / Heather Alexander6-2, 7-6
2022-03-05vs OH NEO C 7.5W HendricksLost 12
W#1 DoublesCheridah Renuart / Sarah Grauel vs Carla Elenz / Brenda Kekel6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaroline Cooke / Della Michalos vs Joan Kerosky / Hannah Morrison3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEllie Effinger / MAGGIE GRAY vs AMY HENDRICKS / Kasey Bland0-6, 4-6
2022-02-26vs C 7.5W CC HorganLost 12
W#1 DoublesEllie Effinger / MAGGIE GRAY vs Margaret VanDine / Danielle Simpson6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth DeLuca / Tonya Derrig vs Natalie Marotta / Mary Maleski6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLark Steinmetz / Shannon McHale vs Marnie Walcutt / Maria Ganim1-6, 4-6
2022-02-12vs C 7.5W TP SchaffnerWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheridah Renuart / Sarah Grauel vs Kristianne Bontempo / Erin Baginski6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesElizabeth DeLuca / Tonya Derrig vs Shelby Schaffner / Michelle Fox6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesShannon McHale / Lark Steinmetz vs Cora Shane / Amanda Durbin7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-02-05vs C 7.5W LT GalehouseWon 30
W#1 DoublesCheridah Renuart / Sarah Grauel vs Alicia Blessing / Karen Sterling7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesShannon McHale / Angela Snowball vs Christa Galehouse / Donna Balc6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth DeLuca / Cynthia Rhyner vs Laura Getch / Cynthia Petrik6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · NEOTA 7.5W Combo Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1C 7.5W CC Horgan82171330278
2OH NEO C 7.5W Hendricks7321924227
3C 7.5W A AO Bartram73181232250
4C 7.5W B WR Daberko64171328264
5C 7.5W A PW1 Atkinson64171332281
6C 7.5W SP DeLuca64171333277
7C 7.5W B WE Niehenke55171328264
8C 7.5W A NR Wissman55171330252
9C 7.5W B MCRC Aranavage55161433278
10C 7.5W B CV Casamento46121840301
11C 7.5W LT Galehouse37121839288
12C 7.5W GR Johnson37121841323
13C 7.5W TP Schaffner37111944325
14C 7.5W A PW2 DeWerth2862450342

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Cheridah Renuart
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.87
Laurel Marsillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Donna Reynolds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Elizabeth DeLuca
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
Ellie Effinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.71
MAGGIE GRAY
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Jennifer Kirchner
published
3.43
Angela Snowball
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Sarah Grauel
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.34
Tonya Derrig
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.29
Patty Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Michelle Sutton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Catherine Krummel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Della Michalos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Cynthia Rhyner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Caroline Cooke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kimberly Stein
published
Lark Steinmetz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Reynolds + MAGGIE GRAY7160% games+10.2% vs expected
Laurel Marsillo + MAGGIE GRAY9163% games+9.2% vs expected
Angela Snowball + Michelle Sutton361458% games+2.9% vs expected
Tonya Derrig + Cheridah Renuart4252% games+1.6% vs expected
MAGGIE GRAY + Jennifer Kirchner211852% games+1.2% vs expected
Elizabeth DeLuca + Ellie Effinger182051% games+1.1% vs expected
Laurel Marsillo + Jennifer Kirchner4159% games−0.1% vs expected
Elizabeth DeLuca + Laurel Marsillo4453% games−1.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cheridah Renuart
80W–61L career · 12 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
4.06
Laurel Marsillo
149W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Donna Reynolds
46W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Elizabeth DeLuca
68W–74L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ellie Effinger
51W–56L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
MAGGIE GRAY
142W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Jennifer Kirchner
82W–76L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Angela Snowball
65W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
3.43
Sarah Grauel
98W–70L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
Tonya Derrig
104W–85L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Patty Bennett
48W–39L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Michelle Sutton
116W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Catherine Krummel
65W–45L career · 1 line in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Della Michalos
56W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.97
3.5
Cynthia Rhyner
135W–114L career · 2 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.92
Caroline Cooke
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Stein
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lark Steinmetz
34W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.