Teams

SFV-The Pickleball Rejects/Heinrich

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 SFV Fall WE · SFV 18 WEEKEND - Men 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 18 WEEKEND - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
David Yanez
published 4
3.86
Sebastian HEINRICH
published
3.86
Jaime Tovar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.78
Raphael Laigneau
published
3.77
Deep Pulusani
published 4
3.77
Pei Xu
published
Chris Gennusa
published 4
3.73
Josh LeVasseur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Bruno Lamas
published 4
3.68
Omar Enciso
published
3.67
Sheridan Sackett
published
3.58
TJ St Marie
published
3.53
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.52
Anil Punyapu
published 4
3.50
Deepak Antony
published 4
2.94
Kasra Derakhshandeh
published
Eric Stang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh LeVasseur + Jaime Tovar314 matchesnot enough data
TJ St Marie + Miguel Ortiz-Reyes213 matchesnot enough data
TJ St Marie + Jaime Tovar123 matchesnot enough data
Richard Ortiz-Reyes + Miguel Ortiz-Reyes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Yanez
12W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.95
Sebastian HEINRICH
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Jaime Tovar
125W–29L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
25W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Raphael Laigneau
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Deep Pulusani
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Pei Xu
16W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Chris Gennusa
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Josh LeVasseur
46W–39L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Bruno Lamas
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Omar Enciso
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Sheridan Sackett
23W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.67
TJ St Marie
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.58
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
29W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
4
Anil Punyapu
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
4
Deepak Antony
4W–16L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Kasra Derakhshandeh
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.94
Eric Stang
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.