Teams

KY/LEX/Overstreet/Lykins

2024 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over SOUTHERN COMBO DOUBLES LEXINGTON · 6.5 ADULT WOMEN

18 players · average NTRP 3.44 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Catherine McDoniel
published 3.5
3.35
Dainn Park
published 3.5
3.35
Brooke Marnitz
published 3.5
3.33
Sophie Schmidt
published
3.32
Laura Kennoy
published
3.30
Allyssa Kilanowski
published 3.5
3.27
Davis Dickens
published 3.5
3.24
Meghan Simonsen
published
3.19
Allison Overstreet
published 3.5
3.14
Amy Shropshire
published 3.5
3.14
Lee Walker
published
2.98
Marvetta Overstreet
published
2.97
Patti Stanton
published
2.97
Madison Liford
published
2.81
Ann Albrecht
published 3
2.76
Leah Lykins
published
2.75
Lee Ann Sheehy
published
Meredith Ginn Lam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Lykins + Brooke Marnitz4171% games+22.9% vs expected
Lee Walker + Ann Albrecht13361% games+14.8% vs expected
Laura Kennoy + Brooke Marnitz5552% games+9.3% vs expected
Allison Overstreet + Marvetta Overstreet1932% games−11.6% vs expected
Marvetta Overstreet + Catherine McDoniel314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Overstreet + Brooke Marnitz303 matchesnot enough data
Allison Overstreet + Lee Walker123 matchesnot enough data
Marvetta Overstreet + Sophie Schmidt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine McDoniel
16W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Dainn Park
34W–19L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Brooke Marnitz
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
Sophie Schmidt
24W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Laura Kennoy
21W–29L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Allyssa Kilanowski
13W–34L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Davis Dickens
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Meghan Simonsen
12W–29L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Allison Overstreet
31W–61L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Amy Shropshire
10W–21L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
3.14
Lee Walker
68W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.14
Marvetta Overstreet
11W–51L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.98
Patti Stanton
9W–54L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.97
Madison Liford
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Ann Albrecht
35W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
Leah Lykins
36W–38L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
2.76
Lee Ann Sheehy
17W–37L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Meredith Ginn Lam
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.