Teams

GTC RED

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs EM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKelly Nordini / Brooke O'Drobinak vs Michele Olree / Jll McLain6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesValerie Imperial vs Jean Steimel3-6, 3-6
2023-04-22vs GCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesValerie Imperial / Claire Buck vs Sarah Dennis / Tricia Blechman7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKelly Nordini vs Hillary Conway6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMinou Cramer / Brooke O'Drobinak vs Emer Dempsey / Karen Raftery4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-15vs CACM ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesMinou Cramer / Brooke O'Drobinak vs Karen Collier / Inessa McGill7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesValerie Imperial vs Juli Reiakvam6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-08vs CM BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesValerie Imperial / Brooke O'Drobinak vs Romi Hovey / Taylor Pardun6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLisa Winston / Kelly Nordini vs Jennifer Kane / Katie McCrimmon6-2, 6-2
2023-04-01vs LTFC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMinou Cramer / Brooke O'Drobinak vs Jill Myers / Dianne Leoni6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKelly Nordini vs Sandy Biley4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesValerie Imperial / MacAyla Hansen vs Lynne Monnar / Heather McGinnis6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Brooke O'Drobinak
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.40
Claire Buck
published 3.5
3.37
Minou Cramer
published 3.5
3.16
Kelly Nordini
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Valerie Imperial
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
MacAyla Hansen
published
Megan Ackley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Imperial + Kelly Nordini91247% games−0.0% vs expected
Brooke O'Drobinak + Minou Cramer9557% games−11.3% vs expected
Megan Ackley + MacAyla Hansen033 matchesnot enough data
MacAyla Hansen + Valerie Imperial033 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Nordini + Brooke O'Drobinak213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brooke O'Drobinak
75W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Claire Buck
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Minou Cramer
54W–69L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Kelly Nordini
74W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Valerie Imperial
102W–103L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
MacAyla Hansen
19W–36L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Megan Ackley
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.