Teams

GCC RED

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs CACM ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Dennis / Tricia Blechman vs Karen Collier / Inessa McGill4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-22vs GTC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Dennis / Tricia Blechman vs Valerie Imperial / Claire Buck5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEmer Dempsey / Karen Raftery vs Minou Cramer / Brooke O'Drobinak6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-15vs CM BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmer Dempsey / Allison Kaelberer vs Jennifer Kane / Michelle Eidson2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTricia Blechman / Breanna Hunt vs Katie Comisky / Romi Hovey6-3, 6-1
2023-04-08vs LTFC NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesBreanna Hunt / Tricia Blechman vs Dianne Leoni / Lisa Robertson6-2, 6-3
2023-04-06vs EM REDLost 01
L#1 SinglesAllison Kaelberer vs Kimberley Silverman0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Breanna Hunt
published 3.5
3.39
Hilary McDonald
published
3.35
Tricia Blechman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Emer Dempsey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Amy Reilly
published 3.5
3.07
Karen Raftery
published
2.99
Allison Kaelberer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Hillary Conway
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hilary McDonald + Tricia Blechman12558% games+4.7% vs expected
Allison Kaelberer + Emer Dempsey3251% gamesnot enough data
Karen Raftery + Allison Kaelberer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Breanna Hunt
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.51
Hilary McDonald
27W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Tricia Blechman
56W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.35
3.5
Emer Dempsey
86W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Amy Reilly
24W–20L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.14
Karen Raftery
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Allison Kaelberer
95W–101L career · 2 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Hillary Conway
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.