Teams

CM BLUE

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

8 players · average NTRP 3.60 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-29vs LTFC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatie Comisky / Mary Vivo vs Maria Bales / Juliana Daugherty6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLea VanSchaack / Romi Hovey vs Jill Myers / Michelle Lockwood5-7, 3-6
2023-04-23vs EM REDSplit 11
L#1 SinglesTaylor Pardun vs Kimberley Silverman1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMichelle Eidson / Romi Hovey vs Jean Steimel / Melissa Zink1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-04-15vs GCC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Kane / Michelle Eidson vs Emer Dempsey / Allison Kaelberer6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesTaylor Pardun vs Hilary McDonald7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Comisky / Romi Hovey vs Tricia Blechman / Breanna Hunt3-6, 1-6
2023-04-08vs GTC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRomi Hovey / Taylor Pardun vs Valerie Imperial / Brooke O'Drobinak1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Eidson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-04-01vs CACM ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesRomi Hovey / Lea VanSchaack vs Tandy Dilworth / Lauren Flynn6-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMichelle Eidson vs Serena Sampat2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Vivo / Katie McCrimmon vs Inessa McGill / Juli Reiakvam3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Mary Vivo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Katie Comisky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.34
Taylor Pardun
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Romi Hovey
published
3.23
Lea VanSchaack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Michelle Eidson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Katie McCrimmon
published
Jennifer Kane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Comisky + Mary Vivo6352% games+3.2% vs expected
Lea VanSchaack + Romi Hovey91448% games−1.8% vs expected
Lea VanSchaack + Mary Vivo3446% gamesnot enough data
Katie McCrimmon + Mary Vivo224 matchesnot enough data
Lea VanSchaack + Katie Comisky213 matchesnot enough data
Katie McCrimmon + Taylor Pardun123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Eidson + Taylor Pardun213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Vivo
65W–62L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Katie Comisky
36W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Taylor Pardun
189W–139L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Romi Hovey
30W–27L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Lea VanSchaack
56W–85L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Michelle Eidson
86W–64L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Katie McCrimmon
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Kane
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.