Teams

Igharas/Rodriguez 3.5 18 Mon

2023 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-01vs Phelps 3.5 18 Mon PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesSerena Igharas / April Post vs Stephanie Renn / Nicole Geier6-1, 6-2
2023-04-24vs Dagger 3.5W 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesSerena Igharas / Claudia Rodriguez vs Meghan Hilleboe / Janet Howard6-3, 6-4
2023-04-17vs Davis/Durham 3.5 18 MonWon 10
W#2 DoublesClaudia Rodriguez / Serena Igharas vs Frida Nordmark / Linda Hestenes6-1, 6-1
2023-03-27vs Pollina 3.5 18 Mon PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandy Cathers / Serena Igharas vs Leslie Sheppard / Christa Wykoff4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-03-13vs Goy/Georgevich 18s 3.5 Mon PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesSerena Igharas / Claudia Rodriguez vs Jennifer Tewksbury / Lindsay Reynolds1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
AMANDA ELDER
published 3.5
3.38
Megan Noltemeyer
published
3.32
Serena Igharas
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.32
Reeves Rhoten
published
3.25
Tammy Tao
published
2.99
Sandy Cathers
published
2.95
Melanie Burns
published
2.90
2.85
Amy Kemp
published 3
2.70
Lynn Crawford
published
2.63
Selma Ahnert
published
Jenny McArthur
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Tao + Lynn Crawford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
AMANDA ELDER
20W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Megan Noltemeyer
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Serena Igharas
149W–124L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Reeves Rhoten
30W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Tammy Tao
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
Sandy Cathers
25W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
Melanie Burns
27W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sandra Hickman Turner
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Amy Kemp
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
2.85
Lynn Crawford
15W–27L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Selma Ahnert
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
2.63
Jenny McArthur
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.