Teams

Dulin TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 Tues

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-27vs Harris TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKim Hunt / Catherine Tanner vs Dabney Porter / Beverly Tuttle3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-06-20vs Kramer TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Hunt / Catherine Tanner vs Robin Crosier / Michele Shigo6-2, 6-1
2023-06-13vs Esson-Weeks TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesLost 01
L#3 DoublesGrace Parsons / Brenda Varner vs Celestial Corridon / Sheila Schmedes1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-06vs Pretzsch TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesFelicia Price / Kim Hunt vs Vangie Cruz / Marlene Crewes6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBrenda Varner / Grace Parsons vs Faye Halvorsen / Kelly Albright1-6, 6-7
2023-05-23vs Goodman TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Vary / Kim Hunt vs Cheryl Scott / Kimberly Franz6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGrace Parsons / Brenda Varner vs Linda Shuster / Melinda Tucker6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Catherine Tanner
published 4
3.68
Felicia Price
published 4
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Gracie Womack
published 3.5
3.30
Laura Vary
published
3.30
Tesha Whaley
published
3.30
Melissa Gujrati
published
3.25
Lora Farlow
published
3.22
Stacey Dennehy
published
2.89
Susan Rogers
published
2.86
Brenda Varner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.85
Amy Dulin
published 3
2.73
Aimee Largen
published 3
Lisa Cook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Largen + Amy Dulin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Tanner
41W–39L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Felicia Price
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Gracie Womack
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.35
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
Tesha Whaley
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Melissa Gujrati
19W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Lora Farlow
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Stacey Dennehy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
Susan Rogers
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Brenda Varner
138W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Amy Dulin
8W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Aimee Largen
15W–29L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Lisa Cook
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.