Teams

Pretzsch TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 Tues

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-18vs Goy TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarlene Crewes / Jill Fritz vs Cari Powell / Kara Ray4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAlisa Miller / Marian Hogan vs Chetana Honnarayanahalli / Kristin Williamson5-7, 4-6
2023-07-11vs Harris TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDell Barbee / Jill Fritz vs Dabney Porter / Andrea Shafer2-3
W#2 DoublesNell Pretzsch / Marian Hogan vs Jennifer Yates / Stephanie Gilmer6-3, 6-0
W#1 DoublesMarian Hogan / Marlene Crewes vs Donna Esson / Joy Martin6-2, 6-2
2023-05-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJill Fritz / Lisa Andree vs Melissa Goodman / Cheryl Scott1-6, 3-6
2023-05-23vs Hjelt TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDell Barbee / Jill Fritz vs Jessica Huellmantel / Jean Eagan6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Dell Barbee
published 4
3.60
Marian Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Lisa Andree
published
3.50
Jill Fritz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Marlene Crewes
published
3.30
Vangie Cruz
published
3.29
Nell Pretzsch
published
3.18
Carrie Tauber
published 3.5
3.05
Kelly Albright
published
2.84
Alisa Miller
published 3
2.80
Faye Halvorsen
published
2.52
Anne Cashion
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nell Pretzsch + Carrie Tauber1435% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Andree + Marian Hogan404 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Albright + Alisa Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dell Barbee
17W–15L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Marian Hogan
128W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.60
Lisa Andree
24W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
Jill Fritz
50W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Marlene Crewes
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
86%14%<1%
3.35
Vangie Cruz
20W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Nell Pretzsch
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Carrie Tauber
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Kelly Albright
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Alisa Miller
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
Faye Halvorsen
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Anne Cashion
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.