Teams

Hjelt TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 Tues

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-07-11vs Nundkumar TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Hall / Megan Streba vs Tammy Kasik / Michele Alvarino2-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs Kramer TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJean Eagan / Linda Hall vs Sue Blanchard / Florence Henon6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Yvonne Singh
published
3.60
Emmy Biaggi
published
3.49
Kamron Moody
published
3.38
Suzanne Rudy
published
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
published 3.5
3.32
Jessica Huellmantel
published
3.30
Stacey Russo
published
3.29
Jen Berlin
published
3.15
Jaime Hendricks
published
3.14
Allison Pool
published 3.5
3.12
Kathryn Fleihan
published
2.71
Megan Streba
published
Linda Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Pool + Jen Berlin2440% games−2.1% vs expected
Kathryn Fleihan + Megan Streba044 matchesnot enough data
Emmy Biaggi + Jen Berlin134 matchesnot enough data
Kamron Moody + Jen Berlin044 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Hjelt + Jen Berlin224 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Fleihan + Kamron Moody123 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Hjelt + Allison Pool123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yvonne Singh
13W–2L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
Emmy Biaggi
18W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
Kamron Moody
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Suzanne Rudy
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Jessica Huellmantel
13W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
Stacey Russo
21W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Jen Berlin
22W–25L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
Jaime Hendricks
12W–23L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Allison Pool
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Kathryn Fleihan
30W–35L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
Megan Streba
2W–18L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Linda Hall
100W–71L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.