Teams

Nundkumar TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 Tues

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Christina Rush
published 4.5
3.80
Michele Alvarino
published
3.78
Sara Nundkumar
published
3.64
3.64
Melissa Beeson
published
3.60
Tammy Kasik
published
3.59
Maggie Riley
published
3.48
Melissa Baker
published
3.48
Lauren Varkey
published
3.27
Ashley Xu
published 3.5
3.21
Lucy Callahan
published
3.13
London Kern
published
3.09
Heidi Gingerich
published
Kelly Pryzwansky
published
Lili Harding
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Baker + Ashley Xu9359% games+12.1% vs expected
Sara Nundkumar + Michele Alvarino3257% games+6.2% vs expected
Danielle Broadstreet + Sara Nundkumar0535% gamesnot enough data
Danielle Broadstreet + Michele Alvarino134 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Broadstreet + Heidi Gingerich303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Rush
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.25
Michele Alvarino
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Sara Nundkumar
20W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Danielle Broadstreet
16W–17L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Melissa Beeson
12W–20L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Tammy Kasik
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Maggie Riley
52W–49L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Melissa Baker
35W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Lauren Varkey
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Ashley Xu
32W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Lucy Callahan
12W–21L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
London Kern
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
Heidi Gingerich
22W–34L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kelly Pryzwansky
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lili Harding
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.