Teams

Goy TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 Tues

2023 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#3 DoublesAshton Choros / Blythe Murphy vs Philia Leach / Lydia Nadel6-3, 7-6
2023-07-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Catherine Davis vs Jennifer Hitchcock / Palmer McIntyre3-6, 6-7
2023-06-20vs Hjelt TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesLost 01
L#3 DoublesBlythe Murphy / Cheryl Rankin vs Jen Berlin / Allison Pool5-7, 1-6
2023-06-06vs Nundkumar TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesWon 10
W#3 DoublesShannon Sandifer / Blythe Murphy vs Ashley Xu / Lucy Callahan7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-05-23vs Kramer TRI18 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesLost 01
L#3 DoublesCatherine Davis / Blythe Murphy vs Julie Streng / Donna Davis1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Kristin Williamson
published
3.84
Cari Powell
published 4
3.83
Sayaka Matsuoka
published
3.72
Kara Ray
published
3.71
Yukari Matsuoka
published
3.60
Gina Goy
published 4
3.45
Karrah Durham
published
3.44
Judiann Georgevich
published
3.36
Blythe Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Shannon Sandifer
published
2.91
Ashton Choros
published 3
2.85
Cheryl Rankin
published 3
2.64
Catherine Davis
published 3
Nadia Gregory
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Gina Goy41142% games+3.9% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Judiann Georgevich5159% games+2.3% vs expected
Sayaka Matsuoka + Yukari Matsuoka111248% games−1.1% vs expected
Chetana Honnarayanahalli + Kristin Williamson5257% gamesnot enough data
Gina Goy + Judiann Georgevich4158% gamesnot enough data
Kara Ray + Cari Powell314 matchesnot enough data
Cari Powell + Judiann Georgevich314 matchesnot enough data
Cari Powell + Gina Goy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Williamson
42W–35L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Cari Powell
34W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Sayaka Matsuoka
29W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.83
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.72
Yukari Matsuoka
32W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Gina Goy
34W–35L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Karrah Durham
25W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Judiann Georgevich
36W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.44
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.43
3.5
Blythe Murphy
127W–108L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
Shannon Sandifer
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Ashton Choros
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Cheryl Rankin
26W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Catherine Davis
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
2.64
Nadia Gregory
13W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.