Teams

WNCB O'Brien (ARC South)

NC Singles League 40 & Over WNC 2026 · 40+ Singles Men 3.5 - Sun PM

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-23vs WNCW Brians (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesRobin Smith-Martin vs Javier Garcia4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAdam Knochowski vs Winfield Brians3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesPeter Cook vs Victor Johnson0-6, 1-6
2026-08-16vs WNCC Dixon (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAdam Knochowski vs Bill Madson2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPeter Cook vs Hilawe Semunegus2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesFrancis Mabunga vs Josh Wright2-6, 1-6
2026-07-26vs WNCD West (HRC)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesBreen OBrien vs Samuel Henderson6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAdam Knochowski vs Daniel Walker4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesFrancis Mabunga vs Philip Burleson4-6, 2-6
2026-07-19vs WNCW Brians (ARC South)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesBreen OBrien vs Ben Huggins3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRobin Smith-Martin vs William Krueger4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesPeter Cook vs Benjamin Brock0-6, 0-6
2026-07-16vs WNCC Dixon (ARC South)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesBreen OBrien vs Chris Dixon6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRobin Smith-Martin vs Hilawe Semunegus4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesPeter Cook vs Josh Wright0-6, 1-6
2026-07-05vs WNCD West (HRC)Won 21
W#1 SinglesBreen OBrien vs Daniel Walker6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRobin Smith-Martin vs Chris Westmoreland6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesFrancis Mabunga vs Doug West0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 40+ Singles Men 3.5 - Sun PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCW Brians (ARC South)501239106
2WNCC Dixon (ARC South)329614121
3WNCB O'Brien (ARC South)135716116
4WNCD West (HRC)1541429195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Breen OBrien
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Robin Smith-Martin
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.80
Adam Knochowski
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.70
Francis Mabunga
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.59
Peter Cook
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Knochowski + Robin Smith-Martin3253% games+10.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Breen OBrien
20W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Robin Smith-Martin
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
3
Adam Knochowski
3W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Francis Mabunga
12W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Peter Cook
13W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.