Teams

WNCD West (HRC)

NC Singles League 40 & Over WNC 2026 · 40+ Singles Men 3.5 - Sun PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-02vs WNCC Dixon (ARC South)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesSamuel Henderson vs Chris Dixon3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPhilip Burleson vs Dennis Mason2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesDoug West vs Josh Wright0-6, 1-6
2026-07-26vs WNCB O'Brien (ARC South)Won 21
L#1 SinglesSamuel Henderson vs Breen OBrien1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Walker vs Adam Knochowski6-4, 6-3
W#3 SinglesPhilip Burleson vs Francis Mabunga6-4, 6-2
2026-07-19vs WNCC Dixon (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesStephen Gay vs Dave Kroondyk4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesChris Westmoreland vs Dennis Mason7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDaniel Walker vs Hilawe Semunegus3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-13vs WNCW Brians (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesStephen Gay vs William Krueger7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesDaniel Walker vs Winfield Brians6-7, 2-6
L#3 SinglesPhilip Burleson vs Javier Garcia3-6, 0-6
2026-07-05vs WNCB O'Brien (ARC South)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesDaniel Walker vs Breen OBrien3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesChris Westmoreland vs Robin Smith-Martin4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesDoug West vs Francis Mabunga6-0, 6-2
2026-06-28vs WNCW Brians (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesStephen Gay vs William Krueger1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDaniel Walker vs Benjamin Brock0-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesChris Westmoreland vs Ben Huggins5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 40+ Singles Men 3.5 - Sun PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCW Brians (ARC South)501239106
2WNCC Dixon (ARC South)329614121
3WNCB O'Brien (ARC South)135716116
4WNCD West (HRC)1541429195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Stephen Gay
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.26
Chris Westmoreland
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Daniel Walker
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Philip Burleson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.02
Samuel Henderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Doug West
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Gay + Doug West5067% gamesnot enough data
Stephen Gay + Chris Westmoreland314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Gay
23W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Chris Westmoreland
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Daniel Walker
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Philip Burleson
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
Samuel Henderson
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
Doug West
26W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.