Teams

WNCW Brians (ARC South)

NC Singles League 40 & Over WNC 2026 · 40+ Singles Men 3.5 - Sun PM

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-23vs WNCB O'Brien (ARC South)Won 20
W#2 SinglesWinfield Brians vs Adam Knochowski6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesVictor Johnson vs Peter Cook6-0, 6-1
2026-07-26vs WNCC Dixon (ARC South)Won 20
W#1 SinglesBen Huggins vs Josh Wright6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBenjamin Brock vs Chris Dixon6-3, 6-3
2026-07-19vs WNCB O'Brien (ARC South)Won 21
W#1 SinglesBen Huggins vs Breen OBrien6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesWilliam Krueger vs Robin Smith-Martin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBenjamin Brock vs Peter Cook6-0, 6-0
2026-07-13vs WNCD West (HRC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesWilliam Krueger vs Stephen Gay5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesWinfield Brians vs Daniel Walker7-6, 6-2
2026-07-05vs WNCC Dixon (ARC South)Split 11
L#1 SinglesVictor Johnson vs Bill Madson2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesWinfield Brians vs Hilawe Semunegus3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-28vs WNCD West (HRC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesWilliam Krueger vs Stephen Gay6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBenjamin Brock vs Daniel Walker6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBen Huggins vs Chris Westmoreland7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 40+ Singles Men 3.5 - Sun PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNCW Brians (ARC South)501239106
2WNCC Dixon (ARC South)329614121
3WNCB O'Brien (ARC South)135716116
4WNCD West (HRC)1541429195

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Ben Huggins
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
William Krueger
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.35
Benjamin Brock
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Winfield Brians
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.25
Victor Johnson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benjamin Brock + Winfield Brians224 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Brock + Ben Huggins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ben Huggins
9W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.53
William Krueger
25W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Benjamin Brock
16W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Winfield Brians
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Victor Johnson
24W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.