Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Nickerson

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#3 DoublesKathy McArthur / Janet Pollish vs Danielle Sigrist / Wendy Logan6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMarina Sommers / Kathy McArthur vs Katherine Misskelley / Christina Cooley1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJoann Bailin / Pamela Olson vs Suzanne Young / Annie Ottesen2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKathy McArthur / Nicole Popper vs Susan Thronson / Danielle Sigrist6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCamille Elliott / Kathy McArthur vs Leda Potente / Carina Bloj6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesJennifer Bouffard / Camille Elliott vs Lindy Gaylord / Meredith Bearov7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy McArthur / Janet Pollish vs Katherine Misskelley / Christina Cooley2-6, 3-6
2024-02-04vs CV-PGA West/PalmieriWon 10
W#3 DoublesSherri Nickerson / Kathy McArthur vs PALMIERI PALMIERI / Eleonora Jeans6-2, 6-0
2024-01-14vs CV-PGA West/PalmieriLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathy McArthur / Janet Pollish vs Margaret Middleton / Terri Langhans6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoann Bailin / Kathy McArthur vs Annie Ottesen / Susan Thronson7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNicole Popper / Pamela Olson vs Nancy Economopoulos / Laura Walker6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Jennifer Bouffard
published
3.10
Camille Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Joann Bailin
published
2.98
Pamela Olson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Nina Louie
published
2.85
Kelly Walecki
published
2.75
Kathy McArthur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.74
Jane Peller
published
Marina Sommers
published
Nicole Popper
published
Sherri Nickerson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Bouffard
15W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Camille Elliott
62W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Joann Bailin
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Pamela Olson
65W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%56%43%
2.98
Nina Louie
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
Kelly Walecki
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Kathy McArthur
64W–98L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Jane Peller
24W–63L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Marina Sommers
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Popper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherri Nickerson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.