Teams

Soloists

2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2024-08-28vs Munshell 4.0Won 20
W#2 SinglesTina Halley vs Tana Jankowiak6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Cintya Leveque6-2, 6-2
2024-08-20vs My HOmiesLost 02
L#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Kim Dowd6-7, 0-6
L#3 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Alexis McCary5-7, 3-6
2024-08-13vs No PressureWon 20
W#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Elena Molchanova6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Irena Bucci6-3, 6-3
2024-08-08vs Munshell 4.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Tana Jankowiak6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-04vs My HOmiesLost 01
L#2 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Alexis McCary4-6, 4-4
2024-07-31vs No PressureSplit 11
L#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Cheryl Risell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJessica Somers vs Elena Molchanova6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-27vs Munshell 4.0Split 11
L#2 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Ruzica Ragontse3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJessica Somers vs Cintya Leveque6-1, 6-1
2024-07-22vs My HOmiesLost 01
L#3 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Jemine Bryon5-7, 3-1
2024-07-18vs No PressureWon 20
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Indre Conners6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJessica Somers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-15vs Munshell 4.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesTina Halley vs Bari Abensohn6-2, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJessica Somers vs Sarah Schrieber2-6, 2-6
2024-07-11vs My HOmiesSplit 11
L#2 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Alexis McCary4-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesKelsey Forbes vs Robin Burton6-3, 6-2
2024-07-08Won 10
W#3 SinglesTina Halley vs Julibeth Hernandez6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Jin Lei
published
3.94
Sara Orthwein
published
3.88
Tina Halley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.73
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.69
Kelsey Forbes
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.68
3.60
Jessica Somers
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jin Lei
20W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
Sara Orthwein
19W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Tina Halley
128W–66L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Chanpen Teeranon
208W–208L career · 8 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Kelsey Forbes
140W–112L career · 5 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.69
4
Christine Alewine
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Jessica Somers
124W–176L career · 4 lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.