Teams

No Pressure

2024 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-08-28vs My HOmiesWon 10
W#1 SinglesJerien Okoh-Tisch vs Cora Ho6-2, 6-1
2024-08-20vs Munshell 4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKimberlee Overdeck vs Tana Jankowiak6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Bari Abensohn2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-08-13vs SoloistsLost 02
L#1 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Tina Halley2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesIrena Bucci vs Chanpen Teeranon3-6, 3-6
2024-08-08vs My HOmiesLost 12
L#1 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Alexis McCary1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Cora Ho6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesJerien Okoh-Tisch vs Jessica Bynum2-6, 1-6
2024-08-04vs Munshell 4.0Lost 02
L#2 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Sarah Schrieber4-6, 1-3
L#3 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Bari Abensohn2-6, 1-6
2024-07-31vs SoloistsLost 02
L#2 SinglesIrena Bucci vs Sara Orthwein2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Jessica Somers3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-27vs My HOmiesLost 02
L#1 SinglesKimberlee Overdeck vs Yiziying Chen3-6, 3-5
L#3 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Jessica Bynum1-6, 3-6
2024-07-22vs Munshell 4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesIrena Bucci vs Jean Acuna0-6, 3-5
L#2 SinglesSueyun Hsieh vs Tana Jankowiak2-6, 0-6
2024-07-18Lost 01
L#2 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Christine Alewine2-6, 2-6
2024-07-15vs My HOmiesLost 02
L#1 SinglesIrena Bucci vs Jemine Bryon1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Allison Papadopoulos2-6, 0-6
2024-07-08vs SoloistsLost 02
L#1 SinglesElena Molchanova vs Sara Orthwein2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesIrena Bucci vs Christine Alewine4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheryl Risell
published 4
3.72
Kimberlee Overdeck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jerien Okoh-Tisch
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.60
Sueyun Hsieh
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.51
Elena Molchanova
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.31
Irena Bucci
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
2.96
Indre Conners
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Risell
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Kimberlee Overdeck
81W–132L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Jerien Okoh-Tisch
122W–86L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Sueyun Hsieh
141W–113L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.60
3.5
Elena Molchanova
145W–82L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Irena Bucci
97W–125L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Indre Conners
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.