Teams

Ogden-Cox/Johnstun

2021 Fall Outdoor League-Weekday · 3.0W

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-10-20vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/BickmoreWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoy Peterson / Patty Morita-Nagai vs Karla Block / Candy Friedli6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLindsay Andersen / Vicki Cox vs LISA PERMENTER / Jill Gold3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrooke Curtis / Pilar Olsen vs Kristin Finlayson / Jocelyn Bennion6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLindsay Andersen vs Chelsea Spencer6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Curtis / Joy Peterson vs Penny Gambill / Naomi Stroud-Peterson6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesYaeko Bryner / Pilar Olsen vs Emily Peterson / Tiffany Zarbock4-6, 3-6
2021-10-06vs Riverside Country Club-TC UnitedLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrooke Curtis / Wendy Johnstun vs Kimberly Lee / Tema Laussen3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoy Peterson / Vicki Cox vs Michelle Hansen / Alyson Freedman1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Andersen / Pilar Olsen vs Laura Thorpe / Becky Caldwell4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-09-29vs RISE AC - Price/KempSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBrooke Curtis vs Alison Pearce5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesVicki Cox / Yaeko Bryner vs Angie Hoggan / Camie Nielson6-2, 6-1
2021-09-22vs South Jordan-MechamWon 50
W#1 DoublesJacki Joseph / Patty Morita-Nagai vs Erin Bradley / Lisa Packer7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBrooke Curtis vs Rebecca England6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoy Peterson / Lindsay Andersen vs Heather George / Sarah Gardner6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVicki Cox / Yaeko Bryner vs Nancy Miller / LaRae Dean6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#4 DoublesPilar Olsen / Wendy Johnstun vs Traci Ashton / Janet Astle3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-09-15vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Hurd/MaxfieldLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrooke Curtis / Wendy Johnstun vs Sheri Thompson / Ann Weaver1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLindsay Andersen vs Lisa Stebbing2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPatty Morita-Nagai / Yaeko Bryner vs Bea Jensen / Lisa Wade6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJacki Joseph / Pilar Olsen vs Kim Cronin / Nicole Fisher1-6, 2-6
2021-09-01vs Provo High School-PageLost 23
W#1 DoublesJacki Joseph / Joy Peterson vs Angela Woods / Melissa Pennock4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLindsay Andersen vs Amy Teemant4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Curtis / Wendy Johnstun vs Kelli Lowell / Marty Evans6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesVicki Cox / Yaeko Bryner vs Lisa Michie / Amie Page6-7, 1-6
L#4 DoublesPilar Olsen / Patty Morita-Nagai vs Lanie Wilkinson / Lisa Hart2-6, 2-6
2021-08-25vs Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna/BickmoreWon 40
W#1 DoublesJacki Joseph / Patty Morita-Nagai vs Karla Block / Kathrine Wright6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrooke Curtis / Wendy Johnstun vs Mary Peterson / LISA PERMENTER6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVicki Cox / Joy Peterson vs Mari Bickmore / Courtney Longhurst7-6, 6-4
W#4 DoublesPilar Olsen / Lindsay Andersen vs Candy Friedli / Amy Looney6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Jacki Joseph
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Lindsay Andersen
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.37
Brooke Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.76
Joy Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Angela Inloes
published 3
2.37
Vicki Cox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Patty Morita-Nagai
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Pilar Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #4 Doubles 43% · published
Wendy Johnstun
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Yaeko Bryner
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacki Joseph + Joy Peterson6261% games+10.2% vs expected
Brooke Curtis + Lindsay Andersen27660% games+7.1% vs expected
Wendy Johnstun + Brooke Curtis11755% games+7.0% vs expected
Patty Morita-Nagai + Jacki Joseph7262% games+6.8% vs expected
Jacki Joseph + Lindsay Andersen13559% games+6.4% vs expected
Jacki Joseph + Brooke Curtis11754% games+4.7% vs expected
Brooke Curtis + Joy Peterson282054% games+1.8% vs expected
Wendy Johnstun + Jacki Joseph7749% games+0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacki Joseph
227W–161L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
3.44
Lindsay Andersen
117W–67L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Brooke Curtis
148W–93L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
Joy Peterson
92W–82L career · 6 lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.76
3
Angela Inloes
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicki Cox
35W–125L career · 6 lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
2.37
Patty Morita-Nagai
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Pilar Olsen
27W–70L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Johnstun
46W–74L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Yaeko Bryner
11W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.