Teams

MLong-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-07-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPenny Kraft vs Devon Horine3-6, 3-6
2025-07-01vs SFranks-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Anne Cable2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-30vs CYu-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Lina Habib2-6, 4-6
2025-06-18vs KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 01
L#2 SinglesKathryn Howington vs Kim McWhorter1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Rebecca Walsh6-2, 6-1
2025-06-09vs CYu-ENOLost 01
L#3 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Mary Clare Rosemeyer2-6, 4-6
2025-06-04vs KGreen-ENOLost 02
L#1 SinglesKathryn Howington vs Keshia Green4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Jennifer Kuzma4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-02vs HRoss-ENOLost 01
L#2 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Lynsey Easley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-05-29vs KPollak-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Amber Cagle1-6, 6-7
2025-05-20vs KMcWhorter-HVCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesKathryn Howington vs Valerie Michael7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSara Lawrence vs Lauren Muth Humphreys6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Kensy Ryan6-1, 6-1
2025-05-20vs LKulp-SVCWon 10
W#2 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Lauren Kulp6-3, 6-1
2025-05-07vs LBible-ENOLost 01
L#2 SinglesKathryn Howington vs Loralie Bible4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Corinne Haywood
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Madison Collier
published
3.33
Courtney Rivard
published 3.5
3.28
Polly Creveling
published
3.18
Kathryn Howington
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Sara Lawrence
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.01
Aine Lynch
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.66
Penny Kraft
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinne Haywood + Kathryn Howington213 matchesnot enough data
Sara Lawrence + Mary T Long303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Corinne Haywood
120W–65L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Madison Collier
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Courtney Rivard
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Polly Creveling
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Kathryn Howington
27W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Sara Lawrence
160W–120L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Aine Lynch
21W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Penny Kraft
120W–327L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.