Teams

CM GREEN

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-15vs DTC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesDouglas Sparks / Richard Wilhelm vs Brad Yamamoto / Kevin Hays0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSteven Tamez vs Andrew Manguart0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAlec Smith / Craig Ricketts vs Josh Lozow / Paul Robbertz7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEli Anderson / David Leuthold vs Christopher Watts / Greg Hamilton2-6, 1-6
2026-07-08vs GTC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCraig Ricketts / Richard Wilhelm vs David Baker / Roger Montoya7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrian Turner vs Sebastian DeBenedittis3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBruce Anderson / Jeff Robert vs Gary Abrams / Nikolai Voitsekhovitch2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSydney Harrison / Adam Barkin vs Ignacio Velasco / Bruce Silver7-6, 6-1
2026-07-01vs CP BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesAlec Smith / Richard Wilhelm vs David Capra / Barry Zink1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSteven Tamez vs Casper Lundemann6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Ricketts / Brian Turner vs Paul Henkelmann / Michael DiFilipo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Leuthold / Jeff Robert vs Brent Cutcliffe / Eric Reynolds0-6, 6-7
2026-06-24vs GPTC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesDouglas Sparks / Richard Wilhelm vs John McManemin / Andres Seijas6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBrian Turner vs Dylan Pearson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlec Smith / Craig Ricketts vs David Abdo / Joseph Abdo6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBruce Anderson / Jeff Robert vs Eric Kurtz / George Haddad6-1, 6-1
2026-06-17vs CACM REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDouglas Sparks / Richard Wilhelm vs Michael Nobles / James Parker6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSteven Tamez vs Edward Timmins3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Ricketts / Alec Smith vs Jason Wang / Ralf Weizenbeck6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDavid Leuthold / Jeff Robert vs Daniel Chin / Jeff Kinzler4-6, 4-6
2026-06-10vs DTC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesAlec Smith / Richard Wilhelm vs Mark Carlson / Gary Friedman6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrian Turner vs Kent Shimek4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEli Anderson / Steven Tamez vs David Fawley / Jeff Barton5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSydney Harrison / Bruce Anderson vs Paul Suter / John Shultzabarger6-3, 6-2
2026-06-03vs CACM BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesDouglas Sparks / Alec Smith vs Bob Lees / Raghav Mathur7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSteven Tamez vs Ben Henry2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Ricketts / Eli Anderson vs Adam Huff / Nick Schroer2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSydney Harrison / Bruce Anderson vs Jeffrey Hirschfeld / Dirk Rasmussen7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Alec Smith
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Craig Ricketts
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.83
Richard Wilhelm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Douglas Sparks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Bruce Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Steven Tamez
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.65
Sydney Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Eli Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Adam Barkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Brian Turner
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
David Leuthold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Jeff Robert
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alec Smith + Craig Ricketts7260% games+9.2% vs expected
Bruce Anderson + Eli Anderson224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Wilhelm + Douglas Sparks314 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Anderson + Jeff Robert123 matchesnot enough data
Alec Smith + Richard Wilhelm213 matchesnot enough data
Eli Anderson + Craig Ricketts123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alec Smith
18W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Craig Ricketts
104W–78L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Richard Wilhelm
13W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Douglas Sparks
11W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Bruce Anderson
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Steven Tamez
26W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Sydney Harrison
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Eli Anderson
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Adam Barkin
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
Brian Turner
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
4
David Leuthold
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.44
Jeff Robert
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.