Teams

CACM RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-15vs CP BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJames Parker / Ali Barghelame vs David Capra / Andy Kim3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEdward Timmins vs Evan Kell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Kinzler / Jonathan Malinzak vs Barry Zink / Eric Reynolds1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJonathan Bach / Daniel Chin vs Tally Lawing / Paul Henkelmann6-7, 2-6
2026-07-08vs GPTC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJason Wang / Michael Nobles vs Bret Chen / Andres Seijas3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJonathan Malinzak vs Eric Fonacier3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDaniel Chin / Erik Graver vs George Haddad / Moz Mirbaba6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRandal Ankeney / Jeff Kinzler vs David Abdo / Joseph Abdo6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2026-07-01vs CACM BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJason Wang / Erik Graver vs Adam Huff / Nick Schroer1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesEdward Timmins vs Ben Henry7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Nobles / Daniel Chin vs Jonathan Watkin / Jonah Staller6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAli Barghelame / James Parker vs Dirk Rasmussen / Mark Naylor6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-24vs DTC GREENLost 13
W#1 DoublesDaniel Chin / Michael Nobles vs David Turner / Stephen Olsen6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Bach vs Kent Shimek3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRalf Weizenbeck / Randal Ankeney vs Mark Carlson / Gary Friedman7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Parker / Jeff Kinzler vs Paul Suter / John Shultzabarger6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2026-06-17vs CM GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichael Nobles / James Parker vs Douglas Sparks / Richard Wilhelm3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEdward Timmins vs Steven Tamez6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJason Wang / Ralf Weizenbeck vs Craig Ricketts / Alec Smith2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Chin / Jeff Kinzler vs David Leuthold / Jeff Robert6-4, 6-4
2026-06-10vs DTC BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesJonathan Malinzak / Jonathan Bach vs Christopher Watts / Greg Hamilton3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesEdward Timmins vs Brad Yamamoto6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAli Barghelame / Michael Nobles vs Josh Lozow / Kevin Ray3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJason Wang / Daniel Chin vs Robert Falkenberg / Eric Snelgrove5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-03vs GTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesJason Wang / Erik Graver vs Nikolai Voitsekhovitch / Andrew Pham1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEdward Timmins vs Kushal R Sheth7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJames Parker / Ralf Weizenbeck vs Roger Montoya / Suresh Gevaran2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRandal Ankeney / Jeff Kinzler vs Bruce Silver / Zachary Hustad4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Edward Timmins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.90
Randal Ankeney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Ralf Weizenbeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Ali Barghelame
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Michael Nobles
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Jonathan Bach
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.62
Erik Graver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Jason Wang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.59
Jonathan Malinzak
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.57
Daniel Chin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.30
Jeff Kinzler
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Chin + Jason Wang3250% games+4.9% vs expected
Ralf Weizenbeck + Randal Ankeney3251% games−3.3% vs expected
Jason Wang + Ralf Weizenbeck4745% games−7.7% vs expected
Ali Barghelame + Michael Nobles2549% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Kinzler + Jonathan Bach134 matchesnot enough data
Erik Graver + Ali Barghelame224 matchesnot enough data
Erik Graver + Jason Wang033 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Chin + Ali Barghelame123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edward Timmins
14W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
Randal Ankeney
18W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Ralf Weizenbeck
40W–57L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Ali Barghelame
57W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Michael Nobles
67W–78L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Jonathan Bach
8W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Erik Graver
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jason Wang
14W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.61
Jonathan Malinzak
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Daniel Chin
20W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Jeff Kinzler
37W–51L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.