Teams

CP BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.81 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-15vs CACM REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDavid Capra / Andy Kim vs James Parker / Ali Barghelame6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEvan Kell vs Edward Timmins3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBarry Zink / Eric Reynolds vs Jeff Kinzler / Jonathan Malinzak6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTally Lawing / Paul Henkelmann vs Jonathan Bach / Daniel Chin7-6, 6-2
2026-07-08vs DTC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesBarry Zink / David Capra vs Mark Carlson / Gary Friedman0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTally Lawing vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Kim / Michael DiFilipo vs David Turner / Morris Askenazi4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCasper Lundemann / Evan Kell vs Paul Suter / John Shultzabarger6-1, 7-5
2026-07-01vs CM GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Capra / Barry Zink vs Alec Smith / Richard Wilhelm6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCasper Lundemann vs Steven Tamez3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPaul Henkelmann / Michael DiFilipo vs Craig Ricketts / Brian Turner6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrent Cutcliffe / Eric Reynolds vs David Leuthold / Jeff Robert6-0, 7-6
2026-06-24vs DTC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrent Cutcliffe / David Capra vs Josh Lozow / Paul Robbertz2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichael DiFilipo vs Brad Yamamoto6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCasper Lundemann / Jonathan Stahl vs David Morrison / Kevin Ray4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTally Lawing / Paul Henkelmann vs Kevin Hays / Christopher Watts7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-17vs GTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesTally Lawing / Casper Lundemann vs Roger Montoya / Suresh Gevaran6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEvan Kell vs Nikolai Voitsekhovitch2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBarry Zink / David Capra vs Gary Abrams / Bruce Silver6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEric Reynolds / Brent Cutcliffe vs Zachary Hustad / Andrew Pham4-6, 4-6
2026-06-10vs CACM BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesBarry Zink / David Capra vs Eddie Pells / Dirk Rasmussen6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMichael DiFilipo vs Raghav Mathur4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEric Reynolds / Brent Cutcliffe vs Adam Huff / Nick Schroer2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJordan Olson / Jonathan Stahl vs Ben Henry / Jonah Staller2-6, 3-6
2026-06-03vs GPTC GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesBarry Zink / David Capra vs Andres Seijas / Dylan Pearson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJonathan Stahl vs Tommy Phillips2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTally Lawing / Casper Lundemann vs Jeff Turner / David Abdo6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBrent Cutcliffe / Eric Reynolds vs Eric Kurtz / Eric Fonacier6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
David Capra
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.88
Michael DiFilipo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.77
Andy Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Brent Cutcliffe
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Tally Lawing
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.68
Eric Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Barry Zink
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Evan Kell
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Jordan Olson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Casper Lundemann
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.52
Jonathan Stahl
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.44
Paul Henkelmann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Peter Nicolson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Casper Lundemann + Tally Lawing6157% games+14.7% vs expected
David Capra + Barry Zink7156% games+3.8% vs expected
Eric Reynolds + Brent Cutcliffe224 matchesnot enough data
Paul Henkelmann + Tally Lawing303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Capra
35W–19L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
Michael DiFilipo
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Andy Kim
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brent Cutcliffe
4W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Tally Lawing
65W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.72
4
Eric Reynolds
6W–12L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Barry Zink
13W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Evan Kell
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Jordan Olson
21W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Casper Lundemann
81W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.55
Jonathan Stahl
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.52
3.5
Paul Henkelmann
24W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
Peter Nicolson
33W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.