Teams

NEGTA/Mary Bell

2024 · 25 NEGTA Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over - Fall

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesTaylor Gaddis / Allison Hill vs Lisa Lepkofker / Yvette van der Wiel6-2, 6-2
2024-11-16vs Brenau-NievesWon 20
W#1 DoublesLois Finlay / Lori Burke vs Sharon Ross / Cha' Lizdas6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesPatty Bettencourt / Dawn Jabloner vs Sue Mayfield / Alyssa Groover7-6, 7-5
2024-11-09vs Sardis-GravittWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Miller / Ally Adler vs Carlin Light / Dallas Dante7-6, 6-3
2024-11-02Won 20
W#1 DoublesTaylor Gaddis / Allison Hill vs Lisa Lepkofker / Yvette van der Wiel6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKaren Miller / Ally Adler vs Lisa Komanski / Lory Tuholski6-2, 6-1
2024-10-26vs Brenau-NievesLost 01
L#3 DoublesTammy Nolan / Dawn Jabloner vs Christine Slate / Alyssa Groover6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2024-10-19vs Sardis-GravittSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTaylor Gaddis / Shawn Davis vs Lecretia Scondras / Sheri de Haan6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Bell / Ally Adler vs Jennifer Watson / Nancy Gravitt7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA Southern Tri-Level 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Allison Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Kathryn Bettencourt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Maxine Dennis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Marin Gerulski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Ally Adler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Patty Bettencourt
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Lois Finlay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Mary Bell
published
2.88
Dawn Jabloner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lori Burke
published
Tammy Nolan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Taylor Gaddis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lois Finlay + Lori Burke3350% gamesnot enough data
Patty Bettencourt + Dawn Jabloner123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Bell + Kathryn Bettencourt213 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Bettencourt + Allison Hill303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Hill
35W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Kathryn Bettencourt
54W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.71
Maxine Dennis
25W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Marin Gerulski
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
3.5
Ally Adler
11W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Patty Bettencourt
46W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Lois Finlay
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Mary Bell
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Dawn Jabloner
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Lori Burke
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Nolan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Gaddis
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.